Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:10:45.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variations and Effects of the Venusian Bow Shock from VEX Mission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Yansong Xue
Affiliation:
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China. email: xys@shao.ac.cn; sg.jin@yahoo.com
Shuanggen Jin
Affiliation:
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China. email: xys@shao.ac.cn; sg.jin@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The upper atmosphere of Venus is not shielded by planetary magnetic field from direct interaction with the solar wind. The interaction of shocked solar wind and the ionosphere results in ionopause. Magnetic barrier, the inner region of dayside magnetosheath with the dominated magnetic pressure deflects the solar wind instead of the ionopause at solar maximum. Therefore, the structure and interaction of venusian ionosphere is very complex. Although the Venus Express (VEX) arrived at Venus in April 2006 provides more knowledge on the Venusian ionosphere and plasma environment, compared to Pioneer Venus Orbiter (PVO) with about 14 years of observations, some important details are still unknown (e.g., long Venusian bow shock variations and effects). In this paper, the bow shock positions of Venus are determined and analyzed from magnetometer (MAG) and ASPERA-4 of the Venus Express mission from May 28, 2006 to August 17, 2010. Results show that the altitude of BS was mainly affected by SZA (solar zenith angle) and Venus bow shocks inbound and outbound are asymmetry.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Barabash, S., et al. 2007, Planet. Space Sci., 55, 1772Google Scholar
Phillips, J. L. & McComas, D. J. 1991, Space Sci. Rev., 55, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, C. T., et al. 1988, Geophys. Res., 93, 5461Google Scholar
Russell, C. T., Luhmann, J. G., & Strangeway, R. J. 2006, Space Sci., 54, 1482Google Scholar
Zhang, T. L., Luhmann, J. G., & Russell, C. T. 1990, Geophys. Res., 95, 14961Google Scholar
Zhang, T. L., et al. 2006, Planet. Space Sci., 54, 1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, T. L., Delva, M., Baumjohann, W., Volwerk, M., Russell, C. T., Barabash, S., Balikhin, M., Pope, S., Glassmeier, K., Wang, C., & Kudela, K. 2008, Space Sci., 56, 790Google Scholar
Titov, D. V., et al. 2006, Planet. Space Sci., 54, 1279Google Scholar