Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:24:34.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Manipulation of Wetting Directions Using Nanostructures with Asymmetric Surface Energies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2014

Changquan Lai
Affiliation:
Singapore MIT Alliance, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore.
Carl V. Thompson
Affiliation:
Singapore MIT Alliance, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
W.K. Choi
Affiliation:
Singapore MIT Alliance, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore.
Get access

Abstract

Ordered arrays of polymeric nanostructures with different shapes were generated using laser interference lithography and plasma etching. Surface energy anisotropy was produced in each nanostructure in the array through oblique angle deposition of a hydrophilic metal. When a water droplet was placed on such a surface, it was found to wet preferentially in the direction of the hydrophilic face. Depending on the shape of the nanostructure and the deposition direction, wetting can be made uni-, bi- or tri-directional. Insights obtained in this study contribute to the understanding of wetting on rough, chemically heterogeneous surfaces and provide new methods to engineer functional surfaces for the control of wetting directions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chaudhury, M. K. and Whitesides, G. M., Science 256, 1539 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokinen, V., Leinikka, M., and Franssila, S., Adv. Mater. 21, 4835 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, K.-H., Xiao, R., and Wang, E. N., Nat Mater, 9, 413 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, T. and Suh, K. Y., Soft Matter 5, 4131 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C. Q., Thompson, C. V., and Choi, W. K., Langmuir 28, 11048 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanii, T., Electron. Commun. Jpn. Part II Electron. 74, 80 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. E. and Dettre, R. H., Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion 43, 112 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, W., Tuteja, A., Mabry, J. M., Cohen, R. E., and McKinley, G. H., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 339, 208 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar