Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:50:36.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gamma-ray observations of supernova remnants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2014

Marianne Lemoine-Goumard*
Affiliation:
Centre d'Études Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan Université Bordeaux 1, CNRS/IN2P3 33175 Gradignan, France E-mail: lemoine@cenbg.in2p3.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the past few years, gamma-ray astronomy has entered a golden age. At TeV energies, only a handful of sources were known a decade ago, but the current generation of ground-based imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes has increased this number to more than one hundred. At GeV energies, the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope has increased the number of known sources by nearly an order of magnitude in its first 2 years of operation. The recent detection and unprecedented morphological studies of gamma-ray emission from shell-type supernova remnants is of great interest, as these analyses are directly linked to the long standing issue of the origin of the cosmic-rays. However, these detections still do not constitute a conclusive proof that supernova remnants accelerate the bulk of Galactic cosmic-rays, mainly due to the difficulty of disentangling the hadronic and leptonic contributions to the observed gamma-ray emission. In the following, I will review the most relevant results of gamma ray astronomy concerning supernova remnants (shell-type and middle-age interacting with molecular clouds).

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Abdo, A. A.et al. 2011, ApJ, 734, 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdo, A. A.et al. 2010, ApJL, 710, L92Google Scholar
Abdo, A. A.et al. 2010, ApJ, 722, 1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdo, A. A.et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 348Google Scholar
Abdo, A. A.et al. 2010, ApJ, 712, 459Google Scholar
Abdo, A. A.et al. 2010, Science, 327, 1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdo, A. A.et al. 2009, ApJL, 706, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowski, A.et al. 2011, A&A, 531, A81Google Scholar
Acero, F.et al. 2013, Astroparticle Physics, 43, 276Google Scholar
Acero, F.et al. 2010, A&A, 512, A62Google Scholar
Acciari, V. A.et al. 2011, ApJL, 730, L20Google Scholar
Acciari, V. A.et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 163Google Scholar
Ackermann, M.et al. 2013, Science, 339, 807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aharonian, F.et al. 2011, ApJ, 692, 1500Google Scholar
Aharonian, F.et al. 2011, A&A, 464, 235Google Scholar
Aharonian, F.et al. 2005, A&A, 437, L7Google Scholar
Aharonian, F.et al. 2004, Nature, 432, 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aharonian, F. & Atoyan, A. M. 1996, A&A, 309, 917Google Scholar
Albert, J.et al. 2007, A&A, 474, 937Google Scholar
Baade, W. & Zwicky, F. 1934, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 20, 259Google Scholar
Bell, A. R. 1978, MNRAS, 182, 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berezhko, E. G. & Voelk, H. J. 2010, A&A, 511, A34Google Scholar
Brandt, T. 2013, these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
Gabici, S. & Aharonian, F. A. 2007, ApJ, 665, L131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giordano, F.et al. 2012, ApJL, 744, L2Google Scholar
Hewitt, J. W. 2012, ApJ, 759, 89Google Scholar
Hughes, J. P. & Rakowski, C. E. and Decourchelle, A. 2009, ApJ, 543, L61Google Scholar
Morlino, G. & Caprioli, D. 2012, A&A, 538, A81Google Scholar
Nolan, P. L.et al. 2012, ApJS, 199, 31Google Scholar
Ohira, Y., Murase, K. & Yamazaki, R. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 1577Google Scholar
Renaud, M.et al. 2011, CRISM proceedings, Memorie della Societa Astronomica ItalianaGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, T.et al. 2011, ApJL, 740, L51Google Scholar
Uchiyama, Y.et al. 2010, ApJL, 723, 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchiyama, Y.et al. 2007, Nature, 449, 576Google Scholar