Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:18:10.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dusty debate: core-collapse supernovae and dust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2014

Rubina Kotak
Rubina Kotak*
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Research Centre, Queen's University, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland email: r.kotak@qub.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dust plays an important role in our understanding of the near and distant Universe. The enormous amounts (≳108M⊙) of dust observed at high redshifts have forced us to revisit the commonly-invoked sites of dust production. Although core-collapse supernovae are the prime candidates for cosmic dust production, their actual contribution to the dust budget has been the subject of much debate in recent years. Here, I will discuss results from several vigorous observational campaigns aimed at quantifying the amount of dust produced by core-collapse supernovae. Although sample sizes are still modest, I will attempt to put the role of supernovae as dust producers into perspective.

Keywords

core-collapse supernovaedustechoes
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S296: Supernova Environmental Impacts , January 2013 , pp. 144 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Bertoldi, F.et al., 2003, A&A, (Letters) 406, 55Google Scholar
Bode, M. & Evans, A., 1979, A&A, 73, 113Google Scholar
Cernushi, F.et al., 1967, Ann. d'Astrophys, 30, 1039Google Scholar
Cherchneff, I.et al., these proceedings.Google Scholar
Danziger, J.et al., 1989, IAUC, 4746, 1Google Scholar
Draine, B., 2009 ASPC, 414, 453Google Scholar
Dwek, E., 1983, ApJ, 274, 175Google Scholar
Dwek, E., Galliano, F., & Jones, , 2007, ApJ, 662, 927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, F. & Wickramasinghe, N. C., 1970, Nature, 226, 62Google Scholar
Kotak, R., et al. 2005, ApJ, (Letters) 628, 123Google Scholar
Kotak, R., et al. 2006, ApJ, (Letters) 651, 117Google Scholar
Kotak, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 306Google Scholar
Liu, W. & Dalgarno, A., 1994, ApJ, 428, L769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, L. B.et al., 1989, Structure and dynamics of the ISM, ed. Springer, 164Google Scholar
Meikle, W. P. S., et al., 2006, ApJ, 649, 332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meikle, W. P. S., et al., 2011, ApJ, 732, 109Google Scholar
Sahu, D. K.et al., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1315Google Scholar
Spyromilio, J., et al. 1988, Nature, 334, 327Google Scholar
Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. 1990, NASA Conf. Publ., 3061, 59Google Scholar