Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:07:27.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new model of emission from microquasar jets, and possible explanation to the outliers of the fundamental plane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2011

Asaf Pe'er
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA email: apeer@cfa.harvard.edu
Piergiorgio Casella
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a new model of emission from jets in microquasars, which implements elements from the study of jets in gamma-ray bursts to these objects. By assuming that electrons are accelerated once at the base of the jet to a power law distribution above a low energy Maxwellian, and are cooled by synchrotron emission and possible adiabatic energy losses along the jet, a wealth of spectra can be obtained. We show our theoretical results which can explain some of the key observations. In particular, we show that: (I) a flat radio spectrum, as is frequently seen, is a natural outcome of the model; (II) Strong magnetic field results in a flux decay in the optical/UV band as Fν ~ ν−1/2, irrespective of many of the uncertainties of the model. (III) An increase of the magnetic field above a critical value of ~105 G leads to a sharp decrease in the flux at the radio band, while the flux at higher frequencies saturates to a constant value. We conclude that scatter in the values of the magnetic field may provide a natural explanation to the observed scatter in the radio/X ray luminosity correlation seen in these objects.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Blandford, R. D. & Königl, A. 1979, ApJ, 232, 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casella, P. & Pe'er, A. 2009, ApJ, 703, L63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, C. R. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pe'er, A. & Casella, P. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soleri, P., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1471Google Scholar