Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T13:30:10.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Complete Census of AGN and Their Hosts from Optical Surveys?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2010

Vivienne Wild
Affiliation:
Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 75014 Paris, France. Email: wild@iap.fr
Timothy Heckman
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Paule Sonnentrucker
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Brent Groves
Affiliation:
Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Lee Armus
Affiliation:
Caltech, Spitzer Science Center, MS 314-6, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
David Schiminovich
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, Columbia University, New York, NY10027, USA
Benjamin Johnson
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK
Lucimara Martins
Affiliation:
NAT-Universidade Cruzeirodo Sul, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Stephanie LaMassa
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Large optical surveys provide an unprecedsCeented census of galaxies in the local Universe, forming an invaluable framework into which more detailed studies of objects can be placed. But how useful are optical surveys for understanding the co-evolution of black holes and galaxies, given their limited wavelength coverage, selection criteria, and depth? Here we present work-in-progress comparing optical and mid-IR diagnostics of three “unusual” low-z populations (luminous Seyferts, dusty Balmer-strong AGN, ULIRGs) with a set of ordinary star-forming galaxies from the SDSS. We address the questions “how well do the mid-IR and optical diagnostics of star formation and AGN strength agree?” and “to what extent do optical surveys allow us to include extreme, dusty, morphologically disturbed galaxies in our ‘complete’ census of BH-galaxy co-evolution?

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Armus, L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlot, S. & Fall, S. M. 2000, ApJ, 539, 718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., & Elbaz, D. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., Tremonti, C., & White, S. D. M. 2004, ApJ, 613, 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, G., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, N. A., Sirocky, M. M., Hao, L., Spoon, H. W. W., Marshall, J. A., Elitzur, M., & Houck, J. R. 2007, ApJ, 654, L45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenkova, M., Ivezić, Ž., & Elitzur, M. 2002, ApJ, 570, L9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dowd, M. J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggianti, B. M. & Wu, H. 2000, ApJ, 529, 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoon, H. W. W., Marshall, J. A., Houck, J. R., Elitzur, M., Hao, L., Armus, L., Brandl, B. R., & Charmandaris, V. 2007, ApJ, 654, L49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, V., Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T., Charlot, S., Lemson, G., Brinchmann, J., Reichard, T., & Pasquali, A. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Q. & Tremaine, S. 2002, MNRAS, 335, 965CrossRefGoogle Scholar