Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:34:40.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-Ray Selected Type 2 QSOs and Their Host Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2010

Vincenzo Mainieri
Vincenzo Mainieri
Affiliation:
ESO, Karl-Schwarschild-Strasse 2, D–85748 Garching bei München, Germany Email: vmainier@eso.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a large sample of X-ray selected type 2 QSOs from the XMM–COSMOS survey. Type 2 QSOs are luminous AGN whose central engines are obscured by large amounts of gas and dust. The selection criteria we have used are based on high X-ray luminosity (LX > 1044 erg s−1) and heavy obscuration (NH > 1022 cm−2). We derived stellar masses and star-formation rate estimates for the host galaxies from the best fit of the observed photometry. Type 2 QSOs are generally hosted in massive galaxies with on-going star formation.

Keywords

galaxies: activequasars: generalX-rays: general
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S267: Co-Evolution of Central Black Holes and Galaxies , August 2009 , pp. 80 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Best, P. N., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinchmann, J., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusa, M. et al. 2010, submitted to A&AGoogle Scholar
Cappelluti, N., et al. 2009, A&A, 497, 635Google Scholar
Dawson, S., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Ceca, R., et al. 2003, A&A, 406, 555Google Scholar
Elbaz, D., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 33Google Scholar
Fiore, F., et al. 2003, A&A, 409, 79Google Scholar
Kauffmann, G., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmer, B. D., et al. 2007, ApJ, 657, 681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, S. J., et al. 2009, ApJS, 184, 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainieri, V., et al. 2002, A&A, 393, 425Google Scholar
Mainieri, V., et al. 2007, ApJS, 179, 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P. J. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 639Google Scholar
Merloni, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, in press [arXiv:0910.4970]Google Scholar
Noeske, K. G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 660, 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, C., et al. 2002, ApJ, 571, 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, J. D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D., et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tozzi, P., et al. 2006, A&A, 451, 457Google Scholar
Trump, J. R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakamska, N. L., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar