Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:08:17.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulations for Terrestrial Planets Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2010

Jianghui Ji
Affiliation:
Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China email: jijh@pmo.ac.cn
Niu Zhang
Affiliation:
Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China email: jijh@pmo.ac.cn Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigate the formation of terrestrial planets in the late stage of planetary formation using two-planet model. At that time, the protostar has formed for about 3 Myr and the gas disk has dissipated. In the model, the perturbations from Jupiter and Saturn are considered. We also consider variations of the mass of outer planet, and the initial eccentricities and inclinations of embryos and planetesimals. Our results show that, terrestrial planets are formed in 50 Myr, and the accretion rate is about 60% - 80%. In each simulation, 3 - 4 terrestrial planets are formed inside “Jupiter” with masses of 0.15 – 3.6 M. In the 0.5 - 4AU, when the eccentricities of planetesimals are excited, planetesimals are able to accrete material from wide radial direction. The plenty of water material of the terrestrial planet in the Habitable Zone may be transferred from the farther places by this mechanism. Accretion may also happen a few times between two giant planets only if the outer planet has a moderate mass and the small terrestrial planet could survive at some resonances over time scale of 108 yr.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Briceño, C. et al. , 2001, Science, 291, 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. E. 2001, Icarus, 152, 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, J. A. & Ip, W. H. 1984, Icarus, 58, 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ida, S. & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ, 604, 388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, J. H., et al. 2003, ApJ, 585, L139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokubo, E. & Ida, S. 2002, ApJ, 581, 666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. H. & Peale, S. J. 2002, ApJ, 567, 596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissauer, J. J. 1993, ARAA, 31, 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagasawa, M. & Ida, S. 2000, AJ, 120, 3311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, S. N., Quinn, T., & Lunine, J. I. 2004, Icarus, 168, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, S. N., Quinn, T., & Lunine, J. I. 2006, Icarus, 183, 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, S. N., Mandell, A. M., & Sigurdsson, S. 2006, Science, 313, 1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safronov, V. S. 1969, Evolution of the Protoplanetary Cloud and Formation of the Earth and the Planets, (Moscow:Nauka)Google Scholar
Mayor, M. & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherill, G. W. 1990, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet Sci., 18, 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, N. & Ji, J. 2009, Science in China Series G, 52 (5), 794CrossRefGoogle Scholar