Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:08:01.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can we trust elemental abundances derived in late-type giants with the classical 1D stellar atmosphere models?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

A. Kučinskas
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Goštauto 12, Vilnius LT-01108, Lithuania email: ak@itpa.lt Vilnius University Astronomical Observatory, Čiurlionio 29, Vilnius LT-03100, Lithuania
V. Dobrovolskas
Affiliation:
Vilnius University Astronomical Observatory, Čiurlionio 29, Vilnius LT-03100, Lithuania
A. Ivanauskas
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Goštauto 12, Vilnius LT-01108, Lithuania email: ak@itpa.lt Vilnius University Astronomical Observatory, Čiurlionio 29, Vilnius LT-03100, Lithuania
H.-G. Ludwig
Affiliation:
GEPI - CIFIST, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France
E. Caffau
Affiliation:
GEPI - CIFIST, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France
K. Blaževičius
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius University, Naugarduko 24, LT-03225 Vilnius, Lithuania
J. Klevas
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Goštauto 12, Vilnius LT-01108, Lithuania email: ak@itpa.lt Department of Physics, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio 9, LT-10222 Vilnius, Lithuania
D. Prakapavičius
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We compare the abundances of various chemical species as derived with 3D hydrodynamical and classical 1D stellar atmosphere codes in a late-type giant characterized by Teff =3640 K, log g = 1.0, [M/H]= 0.0. For this particular set of atmospheric parameters the 3D–1D abundance differences are generally small for neutral atoms and molecules but they may reach up to 0.3–0.4 dex in case of ions. The 3D–1D differences generally become increasingly more negative at higher excitation potentials and are typically largest in the optical wavelength range. Their sign can be both positive and negative, and depends on the excitation potential and wavelength of a given spectral line. While our results obtained with this particular late-type giant model suggest that 1D stellar atmosphere models may be safe to use with neutral atoms and molecules, care should be taken if they are exploited with ions.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Collet, R., Asplund, M., & Trampedach, R. 2007, A&A, 469, 687Google Scholar
Freytag, B., Steffen, M., & Dorch, B. 2002, AN, 323, 213Google Scholar
Freytag, B., Steffen, M., Wedemeyer-Böhm, S., & Ludwig, H.-G. 2003, CO5BOLD User Manual, http://www.astro.uu.se/~bf/co5bold_main.htmlGoogle Scholar
Steffen, M. & Holweger, H. 2002, A&A, 387, 258Google Scholar
Wedemeyer, S., Freytag, B., Steffen, M., Ludwig, H.-G., & Holweger, H. 2004, A&A, 414, 1121Google Scholar