Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:56:08.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New findings increasing solar trend that can change Earth climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Jean-Pierre Rozelot
Affiliation:
OCA-Fizeau Dpt, CNRS UMR 6525, & Université de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, Av. Copernic, 06130 Grasse, France email: rozelot@obs-azur.fr
Cilia Damiani
Affiliation:
INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via Frascati 33, 00040 Monteporzio Catone (Italia) email: damiani@oa-roma.inaf.it
Sandrine Lefebvre
Affiliation:
Université Versailles St-Quentin; UPMC Univ. Paris 06; CNRS/INSU, LATMOS-IPSL, Tour 45-46/4ème étage, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 PARIS cedex 05, France email: sandrine.lefebvre@latmos.ipsl.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Early attempts to find how solar activity can influence the Earth's climate involved comparison of many physical processes, such as dynamo mechanism, magnetic reconnection and eruptive activity, irradiance, open flux and particles variations, global atmospheric chemistry and dynamics.. . . However, such direct links seem to be weak even if the solar effects has been found to be stronger during extended maxima or minima of solar activity. Thus, temporal scales ranging from days to thousand of years must be investigated. A description of the most recent results on solar variability and its possible influence on the Earth's climate and atmosphere will be here addressed, with a particular emphasize on modulations of about 120 years (and harmonics). The extrapolation indicates a significant negative decrease of the solar signal, and consequently a decrease of the global Earth's temperature in the forthcoming years. Such a modulation is also testifying by other means, such as spectral observations of temperature sensitive lines indicating a decline of solar activity around 2015 (up to a new prolonged minimum). Prediction of global effects from the Sun's influence over the climate is thus planted in a new way.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Beer, J., Mende, W., & Stellmacher, R., 2000, “The role of the Sun in climate forcingQuaterly Science Reviews, 19, pp. 403415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benest, C., Froeschl, C., & Lega, E.: 2007. In “Topics in Gravitational Dynamics”, L. N. P., 729, Springer ed., pp. 391405.Google Scholar
Damiani-Badache, C., Rozelot, J. P., Coughlin, K., & Kilifarska, N. 2007, “Influence of the UTLS region on the astrolabes solar signal measurement”, Mont. Nont. Roy. Astr., 380, pp. 609614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, P. E. & Jirikowic, J. L., 1992, “The Sun as a low-frequency harmonic oscillator”, Radiocarbon, 34, pp. 199205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esper, J., Cook, E. R., & Schweingruber, F. H., 2002., Science, 295 (5563): pp. 22502253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazel, Z, Rozelot, J. P.Lefebvre, S., Ajabshirizadeh, A., & Pireaux, S., 2008, “Solar gravitational energy and luminosity variations”, New Astronomy, 13, pp. 6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, J., 2007, “Has solar variability caused climate change that affected human culture?”, Advances in Space Research, 40, pp. 11731180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foukal, P., Fröhlich, C., Spruit, H., & Wigley, T. M. L., 2006, “Variations in solar luminosity and their effect on the Earth's climate”, Nature, 443/14, pp. 161166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haigh, J. D., 1994, “The Role of Stratospheric Ozone in Modulating the Solar Radiative Forcing of Climate”. Nature, 370, 6490/AUG18, p. 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. E, 2000, “The Sun's Role in Long-Term Climate Change”, Space Science Review, 94, pp. 349356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hataway, D. H., 2008, “Solar Cycle Forecasting”, Space Science Reviews, DOI 10.1007/s11214-008-9430-4.Google Scholar
Kodera, & Kuroda, , 2002, “Dynamical response to the solar cycleJGR, 107, D24, pp. 4749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilcik, A., Anderson, C. N. K., Rozelot, J. P., Ye, H.Sugihara, G., & Ozguc, A., 2009, “Nonlinear Prediction of Solar Cycle 24”, The Astrophysical Journal, 693, pp. 11731177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilifarska, N. A., 2006, “Solar Variability and Climate-UTLS amplification of Solar Signal”, Sun and Geosphere, v. 1, No. 1, pp. 5155.Google Scholar
Kitiashvili, I. N. & Kosovichev, A. G. 2008, eprint arXiv:0807.3284Google Scholar
Kleeorin, N. I. & Ruzmaikin, A. A. 1982, Magneto-hydrodynamics, 18, pp. 116122.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, S. & Kosovichev, A. K., 2005, “Changes in the Subsurface Stratification of the Sun with the 11-Year Activity Cycle”, The Astrophysical Journal, 633, Issue 2, pp. L149L152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, S., Rozelot, J. P., & Kosovichev, A. G., 2007, “The change of solar shape in time and depth. Some consequences for space climate”, Advances in Space Research, 40, pp. 10001005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, S., Nghiem, P. A. P., Turck-Chize, S., 2008, “Impact of a radius and composition variation on the solar subsurface layers stratification, arXiv:0809.1726v1, The Astrophysical Journal, 690, pp. 12721279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, et al. , 2009 “Influence of the solar radiation on Earth's climate using the LMDz-REPROBUS model, these proceedings.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milankovich, M., 1930, “Theorie der Klimaschankungen”, Berlin, pp. 1176.Google Scholar
Pap, J., Kuhn, J., Frölich, K., Ulrich, R., Jones, A., & Rozelot, J.P., 1998, “Importance of monitoring solar global properties, luminosity, radius and oscillations”, ESA-SP-417, pp. 267–271.Google Scholar
Penn, M. J. & Livingston, W., 2006, “Temporal Changes in Sunspot Umbral Magnetic Fields and Temperatures”, The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 649, Issue 1, pp. L45L48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozelot, J. P.: 1990, “Helioclimatology, a new science?” International Colloquium on Geo-cosmic relation, Amsterdam, 19-22 avril 1989. Published in “The Earth and its environment”, ed. Tomassen, Pudoc (NL), 1990, p. 92–100.Google Scholar
Sabatino, S. & Haberreiter, M.: 2005, “Past, present and future measurements of the solar diameter”, Advances in Space Research 35, pp. 329 340 and two Corrigenda (i) Advances in Space Research, 37, 8, pp. 1649–1650, and Advances in Space Research, 37, 2, pp. 439–439.Google Scholar
Stothers, R. B. 2006, “A virial theorem investigation of magnetic variations in the Sun”. The Astrophysical Journal, 653, pp. L73L75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Quay, P. D.: 1980, “Changes in atmospheric Carbon-14 attributed to a variable sun”. Science, 207, pp. 1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svalgaard, L., Cliver, E. W., & LeSager, P., 2003, “Determination of interplanetary magnetic field strength, solar wind speed, and EUV irradiance 1890-2003”, In Proceedings of International Solar Cycle Studies Symposium held 13-28 June, 2003 in Tatranska Lomnica, Slovak Republik. Edited by A. Wilson.Google Scholar
Svalgaard, L., Cliver, E. W., Kamide, Y., 2005, “Sunspot Cycle 24: Smallest Cycle in 100 Years?”' In Large-scale Structures and their Role in Solar Activity, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 346, Proceedings of the Conference held 18-22 October, 2004 in Sunspot, New Mexico, USA. Edited by K. Sankarasubramanian, M. Penn, and A. Pevtsov, p. 401.Google Scholar
Turck-Chièze, S. & other co-authors, 2008, “The DynaMICCS perspective”, Experimental Astronomy, (Special Issue on ESA's Cosmic Vision), Vol. 23, pp. 10171055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar