Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T10:13:41.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A survey of the most massive stars in the Magellanic Clouds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Alceste Z. Bonanos*
Affiliation:
Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Road, Washington, DC 20015, USA email: bonanos@dtm.ciw.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite the large impact very massive stars (>30 M) have in astrophysics, their fundamental parameters remain uncertain. I present results of a survey aiming to characterize the most massive stars in the Magellanic Clouds. The survey targets the brightest, blue, eclipsing binaries discovered by the OGLE microlensing survey, for which masses and radii are measured to 5%. Such precise data are rare and provide constraints for theories of massive star formation and evolution at low metallicities.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Andersen, J. 1991, AAPR, 3, 91Google Scholar
Bally, J. & Zinnecker, H. 2005, AJ, 129, 2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanos, A. Z., Stanek, K. Z., Udalski, A., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, L33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanos, A. Z., Stanek, K. Z., Kudritzki, R. P., et al. 2006, ApJ, 652, 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanos, A. Z. 2009, ApJ, 691, 407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromm, V. & Loeb, A. 2006, ApJ, 642, 382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkholder, V., Massey, P., & Morrell, N. 1997, ApJ, 490, 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G. 2000, ApJ, 539, 342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryer, C. L., Mazzali, P. A., Prochaska, J., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinan, E. F., Fitzpatrick, E. L., Dewarf, L. E., et al. 1998, ApJ, 509, L21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, T. J., Hilditch, R. W., & Howarth, I. D. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrero, A. 2008, RMxAC, 33, 15Google Scholar
Hilditch, R. W., Howarth, I. D., & Harries, T. J. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, I. D., Siebert, K. W., Hussain, G. A. J., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumholz, M. R. & Thompson, T. A. 2007, ApJ, 661, 1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, P. 2003, ARAA, 41, 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, P., Waterhouse, E., & DeGioia-Eastwood, K. 2000, AJ, 119, 2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meynet, G. & Maeder, A. 2003, A&A, 404, 975Google Scholar
Orosz, J. A., McClintock, J. E., Narayan, R., et al. 2007, Nature, 449, 872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinsonneault, M. H. & Stanek, K. Z. 2006, ApJ, 639, L67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prša, A. & Zwitter, T. 2005, ApJ, 628, 426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauw, G., De Becker, M., Nazé, Y., et al. 2004, A&A, 420, L9Google Scholar
Repolust, T., Puls, J., & Herrero, A. 2004, A&A, 415, 349Google Scholar
Ribas, I., Jordi, C., Vilardell, F., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, L37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaerer, D., Charbonnel, C., Meynet, G., et al. 1993, AAPS, 102, 339Google Scholar
Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 1992, AAPS, 96, 269Google Scholar
Schnurr, O., Casoli, J., Chené, A.-N., Moffat, A. F. J., & St-Louis, N. 2008, MNRAS, 89, 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walborn, N. R. & Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1990, PASP, 102, 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyrzykowski, Ł., Udalski, A., Kubiak, M., et al. 2003, Acta Astronomica, 53, 1Google Scholar
Yungelson, L. R., van den Heuvel, E. P. J., Vink, J. S., et al. 2008, A&A, 477, 223Google Scholar
Zinnecker, H. & Yorke, H. W. 2007, ARAA, 45, 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucker, S. & Mazeh, T. 1994, ApJ, 420, 806CrossRefGoogle Scholar