Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T13:51:02.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The structural parameters of bulges, bars and discs in the local Universe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

Dimitri Alexei Gadotti*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany email: dimitri@mpa-garching.mpg.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Image decomposition of galaxies is now routinely used to estimate the structural parameters of galactic components. In this work, I address questions on the reliability of this technique. In particular, do bars and AGN need to be taken into account to obtain the structural parameters of bulges and discs? And to what extent can we trust image decomposition when the physical spatial resolution is relatively poor? With this aim, I performed multi-component (bar/bulge/disc/AGN) image decomposition of a sample of very nearby galaxies and their artificially redshifted images, and verified the effects of removing the bar and AGN components from the models. Neglecting bars can result in a overestimation of the bulge-to-total luminosity ratio of a factor of two, even if the resolution is low. Similar effects result when bright AGN are not considered in the models, but only when the resolution is high. I also show that the structural parameters of more distant galaxies can in general be reliably retrieved, at least up to the point where the physical spatial resolution is ≈ 1.5 Kpc, but bulge parameters are prone to errors if its effective radius is small compared to the seeing radius, and might suffer from systematic effects. I briefly discuss the consequences of these results to our knowledge of the stellar mass budget in the local universe, and finish by showing preliminary results from a large SDSS sample on the dichotomy between classical and pseudo-bulges.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Allen, P. D., Driver, S. P., Graham, A. W., Cameron, E., Liske, J., & de Propis, R. 2006, MNRAS 371, 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, R. S. 1995, PhD thesis, University of Groningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
de Souza, R. E., Gadotti, D. A., & dos Anjos, S. 2004, ApJS 153, 411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, S. P., Allen, P. D., Liske, J., & Graham, A. W. 2007, ApJL, in press (astro-ph/0701728)Google Scholar
Gadotti, D. A. 2007, MNRAS, submittedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadotti, D. A. & de Souza, R. E. 2006, ApJS 163, 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadotti, D. A. & Kauffmann, G. 2007, in: Stellar Populations as Building Blocks of Galaxies, IAU Symp. 241, Vazdekis, A., Peletier, R. (eds.), in press (astro-ph/0702054)Google Scholar
Hubble, E. P. 1926, ApJ 64, 321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., Buta, R., & Vasylyev, S. 2004, MNRAS 355, 1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., & Buta, R. 2005, MNRAS 362, 1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar