Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:54:20.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Massive Stars in Galactic Chemical Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

Francesca Matteucci
Francesca Matteucci*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Astronomia, Osservatorio Astronomica di Trieste (INAF)Universita di Trieste, Via G.B. Tiepolo, 11 I-34124 Trieste, Italy email: matteucci@oats.inaf.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I will review the role of massive stars in galactic evolution both from the nucleosynthesis and energetics point of view. In particular, I will highlight some important observational facts explained by means of massive stars in galaxies of different morphological type: the Milky Way, ellipticals and dwarf spheroidals. I will describe first the time-delay model and its interpretation in terms of abundance ratios in galaxies, then I will discuss the importance of mass loss in massive stars to reproduce the data in the Galactic bulge and disk. I will discuss also how massive stars can be important producers of primary nitrogen if rotation in stellar models is taken into account. Concerning elliptical galaxies, I will show that to reproduce the observed [Mg/Fe] versus Mass relation in these galaxies it is necessary to assume a more important role of massive stars in more massive galaxies and that this can be achieved by means of downsizing in star formation. I will discuss how massive stars are responsible in triggering galactic winds both in ellipticals and dwarf spheroidals. These latter systems show a low overabundance of α-elements relative to Fe with respect to Galactic stars of the same [Fe/H]: this is interpreted as due to a slow star formation coupled with very efficient galactic winds. Finally, I will show a comparison between the predicted Type Ib/c rates in galaxies and the observed GRB rate and how we can impose constraints on the mechanism of galaxy formation by studying the GRB rate at high redshift.

Keywords

galaxies: evolution – stars: early-type
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S250: Massive Stars as Cosmic Engines , December 2007 , pp. 391 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Ballero, S., Matteucci, F., Origlia, l. & Rich, R. M., 2007, A&A, 467, 123Google Scholar
Baron, E., 1992, MNRAS, 255, 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., Lundstroem, I., & Ilyn, I., 2005, A&A, 185, 203Google Scholar
Bissaldi, E., Calura, F., Matteucci, F., et al. 2007, A&A, 471, 585Google Scholar
Boissier, S. & Prantzos, N., 1999, MNRAS, 307, 857Google Scholar
Calura, F., 2004, PhD Thesis, Trieste UniversityGoogle Scholar
Cescutti, G., Matteucci, F., François, P. & Chiappini, C., 2007, A&A, 462, 943Google Scholar
Chiappini, C., Matteucci, F., & Gratton, R., 1997, ApJ, 477, 765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappini, C., Hirschi, R., Meynet, G., et al. 2006, A&A, 449, L27Google Scholar
Chiappini, C., Matteucci, F. & Romano, D., 2001, ApJ, 554, 1044Google Scholar
Della Valle, M., 2005, in Il Nuovo Cimento C, 28, 563Google Scholar
Granato, G. L., Silva, L., Monaco, P., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 324, 757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greggio, L. & Renzini, A., 1983, Mem. SaIt, 54, 311Google Scholar
Hirschi, R., 2007, A&A, 461, 571Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, G. & Matteucci, F. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 71Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, G. & Matteucci, F., 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanfranchi, G., Matteucci, F. & Cescutti, G., 2006, A&A, 453, 67Google Scholar
Maeder, A., 1992, A& A, 264, 105Google Scholar
Mannucci, F., Della Valle, M., Panagia, N., et al. 2005, A&A 433, 807Google Scholar
Mannucci, F., Della Valle, M. & Panagia, N., 2006, MNRAS, 370, 773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matteucci, F. & Brocato, E., 1990, ApJ, 365, 539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matteucci, F., 2001, The Chemical Evolution of the Galaxy (Dordrecht: Kluwer)Google Scholar
Matteucci, F., 2003, Ap&SS, 284, 539Google Scholar
Matteucci, F., 1994, A&A, 288, 57Google Scholar
Matteucci, F. & Greggio, L., 1986, A&A, 154, 279Google Scholar
McWilliam, A., Matteucci, F., Ballero, S., et al. 2008, AJ submitted (arXiv:0708.4026)Google Scholar
Meynet, G. & Maeder, A., 2002, A&A, 390, 561Google Scholar
Nomoto, K., Tominaga, N., Umeda, H., et al. 2006, Nucl. Phys. A777, 424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pipino, A. & Matteucci, F., 2004, MNRAS, 347, 968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzini, A. & Voli, M., 1981, A&A, 94, 175Google Scholar
Salpeter, E. E., 1955, ApJ, 121, 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalo, J. M.Fund. Cosmic Phys. 11, 1Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., 1959, ApJ, 129, 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetrone, M. D., Coté, P. & Sargent, W. L. W., 2001, ApJ, 548, 592Google Scholar
Thomas, D., Maraston, C., Bender, R., 2002, in: Schielicke, R. E. (ed.), JENAM 2001: Astronomy with Large Telescopes, (Schielicke: Wiley), Reviews in Modern Astronomy, 15, 219Google Scholar
Tinsley, B. M, 1979, ApJ, 229, 1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, B. M., 1980, Fund. Cosmic Phys., 5, 287Google Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A., 1995, ApJS, 101, 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar