Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:01:59.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Metallicity Dependence of the Mass Loss of Early-Type Massive Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

Alex de Koter*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, NL-1098SJ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands email: dekoter@science.uva.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We report on a comprehensive study of the wind properties of 115 O- and early B-type stars in the Galaxy and the Large Magellanic Clouds. This work is part of the VLT/FLAMES Survey of Massive Stars. The data is used to construct the empirical dependence of the mass-loss in stellar winds on the metal content of their atmospheres. The metal content of early-type stars in the Magellanic Clouds is discussed. Assuming a power-law dependence of mass loss on metal content, Ṁ ∝ Zm, we find m = 0.83 ± 0.16 from an analysis of the wind momentum luminosity relation (Mokiem et al. 2007b). This result is in good agreement with the prediction m = 0.69 ± 0.10 by Vink et al. (2001). Though the scaling agrees, the absolute empirical value of mass loss is found to be a factor of two higher than predictions. This may be explained by a modest amount of clumping in the outflows of the objects studied.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., & Sauval, A. J. 2005, in Barnes, T. G. III & Bash, F. N. (eds.), Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis (San Francisco: ASP) ASP Conf. Ser., 336, 25Google Scholar
Bresolin, F., Pietrzyński, G., Urbaneja, M. A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresolin, F., Urbaneja, M. A., Gieren, W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 2028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Koter, A., Heap, S. R., & Hubeny, I. 1997, ApJ, 477, 792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. J., Smartt, S. J., Lee, J.-K., et al. 2005, A&A, 437, 467Google Scholar
Evans, C. J., Lennon, D. J., Smartt, S. J., & Trundle, C. 2006, A&A, 456, 623Google Scholar
Fullerton, A. W., Massa, D. L., & Prinja, R. K. 2006, ApJ, 637, 1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrero, A., Puls, J., & Najarro, F. 2002, A&A, 396, 949Google Scholar
Hillier, D. J. & Miller, D. L. 1998, ApJ, 496, 407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, I., Dufton, P. L., Smartt, S. J., et al. 2007, A&A, 466, 277Google Scholar
Kaufer, A., Venn, K. A., Tolstoy, E., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 2723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krtička, J. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudritzki, R.-P. & Puls, J. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 613Google Scholar
Leitherer, C., Robert, C., & Drissen, L. 1992, ApJ, 401, 596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokiem, M. R., de Koter, A., Puls, J., et al. 2005, A&A, 441, 711Google Scholar
Mokiem, M. R., de Koter, A., Evans, C. J., et al. 2006, A&A, 456, 1131Google Scholar
Mokiem, M. R., de Koter, A., Evans, C. J., et al. 2007a A&A, 465, 1003Google Scholar
Mokiem, M. R., de Koter, A., Vink, J. S., et al. 2007b A&A, 473, 603Google Scholar
Puls, J., Springmann, U., & Lennon, M. 2000, A&AS, 141, 23Google Scholar
Puls, J., Urbaneja, M. A., Venero, R., et al. 2005, A&A, 435, 669Google Scholar
Puls, J., Markova, N., Scuderi, S., et al. 2006, A&A, 454, 625Google Scholar
Rolleston, W. R. J., Trundle, C., & Dufton, P. L. 2002, A&A, 396, 53Google Scholar
Rolleston, W. R. J., Venn, K., Tolstoy, E., & Dufton, P. L. 2003, A&A, 400, 21Google Scholar
Trundle, C., Dufton, P. L., Hunter, I., et al. 2007, A&A, 471, 625Google Scholar
Venn, K. A. 1999, ApJ, 518, 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, J. S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 2000, A&A, 362, 295Google Scholar
Vink, J. S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 2001, A&A, 369, 574Google Scholar