Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:24:16.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orbital migration and mass-semimajor axis distributions of extrasolar planets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Shigeru Ida  and
D. N. C. Lin
Shigeru Ida
Affiliation:
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan email: ida@geo.titech.ac.jp
D. N. C. Lin
Affiliation:
UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA Kavli Institute of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing, China email: lin@ucolick.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Here we discuss the effects of type-I migration of protoplanetary embryos on mass and semimajor axis distributions of extrasolar planets. We summarize the results of Ida & Lin (2008a, 2008b), in which Monte Carlo simulations with a deterministic planet-formation model were carried out. The strength of type-I migration regulates the distribution of extrasolar gas giant planets as well as terrestrial planets. To be consistent with the existing observational data of extrasolar gas giants, the type-I migration speed has to be an order of magnitude slower than that given by the linear theory. The introduction of type-I migration inhibits in situ formation of gas giants in habitable zones (HZs) and reduces the probability of passage of gas giants through HZs, both of which facilitate retention of terrestrial planets in HZs. We also point out that the effect of magneto-rotational instability (MRI) could lead to trapping of migrating protoplanetary embryos in the regions near an ice line in the disk and it significantly enhances formation/retention probability of gas giants against type-I migration.

Keywords

planetary systems: formationsolar system: formationstars: statics
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S249: Exoplanets: Detection, Formation and Dynamics , October 2007 , pp. 223 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Baruteau, C. & Masset, F. 2008, this proceedingsGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, S. V. W. & Sargent, A. I., 1996, Nature, 383, 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvet, N., Hartmann, L. & Strom, S. E. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. Mannings, V., Boss, A. P. and Russell, S. S. (Tucson:Univ. of Arizona Press), 377Google Scholar
Daisaka, K. J., Tanaka, H. & Ida, S. 2006, Icarus, 185, 492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. S. 2005, ApJ, 620, 994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, D. A. & Valenti, J. A. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromang, S., Terquem, C. & Nelson, R. P. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garaud, P. & Lin, D. N. C. 2007, ApJ, 654, 606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1980, ApJ, 241, 425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillot, T. & Hueso, R. 2006, MNRAS, 367, L47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, C. 1981, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 70, 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ida, S. & Lin, D. N. C. 2004a, ApJ, 604, 388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ida, S. & Lin, D. N. C. 2004b, ApJ, 616, 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ida, S. & Lin, D. N. C. 2005, ApJ, 626, 1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ida, S. & Lin, D. N. C. 2008, ApJ, in pressGoogle Scholar
Ida, S. & Lin, D. N. C. 2008, in preparationGoogle Scholar
Kokubo, E. & Ida, S. 1998, Icarus, 131, 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokubo, E. & Ida, S. 2002, ApJ, 581, 666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kominami, J. & Ida, S. 2002, Icarus, 157, 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, J., Li, H. 2004, in The Search For Other Worlds. AIP Conf. Proc., 713, pp. 63–66Google Scholar
Kretke, K. A. & Lin, D. N. C. 2007, ApJ, 664, L55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughlin, G., Steinacker, A. & Adams, F. C. 2004, ApJ, 309, 846Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. 2005, ApJ, 624, 1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, D., Duncan, M. & Levison, H. F. 2005, AJ, 130, 2884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcy, G. et al. 2005, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 158, 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masset, F. S., D'Angelo, G. & Kley, W., 2006, ApJ, 652, 730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masset, F. S., Morbidelli, A., Crida, A., Ferreira, J., 2006, ApJ, 642, 478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayor, M., Pont, F. & Vidal-Madjar, A. 2005, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 158, 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muto, T. & Inutsuka, S. 2008, this proceedingsGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. P. & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano, T., Miyama, S. M., Umebayashi, T., & Nakano, T., 2000, ApJ, 543, 486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337Google Scholar
Tanaka, H., Takeuchi, T. & Ward, W. 2002, ApJ, 565, 1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thommes, E. & Murray, N. 2006, ApJ, 644, 1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, W. 1986, Icarus, 67, 164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Lin, D. N. C. & Kretke, K. A. 2008, in: Sun, Y.-S., Ferraz-Mello, S. & Zhou, J.-L., (eds.), Exoplanets: Detection, Formation and Dynamics, Proc. IAU Symposium No. 249 (Suzhou,China), p. 309Google Scholar