Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:07:20.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Damping of hydromagnetic waves by bulk viscosity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

M. H. Ibáñez S.
M. H. Ibáñez S.*
Affiliation:
Centro de Física Fundamental, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de los Andes, La Hechicera, Mérida, Venezuela email: mhibanez@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It was shown in a previous paper (Ibáñez 2004) that for certain kind of plasmas the coefficient of second (bulk) viscosity can be orders of magnitude larger than the coefficients corresponding to the dynamical viscosity and to the thermometric conductivity. In the present paper, the damping effects of the second viscosity on the hydromagnetic waves propagation are analyzed. In particular, we study the effect of the second viscosity on the magnetoacustic waves propagating in a photoionized gas of arbitrary metallicity Z and mean energy E of the ionizing photons when an initial steady magnetic field H is present.

Keywords

wavesplsmasMHD
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S247: Waves & Oscillations in the Solar Atmosphere: Heating and Magneto-Seismology , September 2007 , pp. 337 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Braginskii, S. I. 1965, Rev. Plasma Phys. 1, 205Google Scholar
Carbonell, M.Oliver, R. and Ballester, J.L. 2004, A&A 415, 737Google Scholar
Corbelli, E. & Ferrara, A. 1995, ApJ 447, 720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgarno, A. & McCray, R. A. 1972, ARAA 10, 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennebelle, P & Passot, T. 2006, A&A 448, 1083Google Scholar
Heiles, C. & Troland, T. 2005, ApJ 624, 773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibáñez, S. M. H. 2004, Phys. Plasmas 11, 5190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibáñez, S.M. H & Escalona, T.O. B. 1993, ApJ 415, 335Google Scholar
Kumar, N., Kumar, P. & Singh, S. 2006, A&A 453, 1067Google Scholar
Kumar, N. & Kumar, P. 2006, Solar Phys 236, 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E.M. 1966 Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Pergamon, London).Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1987, Fluid Mechanics (Pergamon Press, London)Google Scholar
Launay, J. M & Roueff, E.A&A 1977, 56, 289Google Scholar
Moortel, De & Hood, A. W., 2003 A&A 408, 755.Google Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1979, Cosmical Magnetic Field (New York, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Roberts, B. 2000, Solar Phys. 193, 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaton, M. J.MNRAS 1959, 119, 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shull, J. M. & Van Steenberg, M. E. 1985, ApJ 298, 268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium (New York: Wiley)Google Scholar