Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:20:18.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ronald Coase's theory of the firm and the scope of economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2014

BRIAN J. LOASBY
BRIAN J. LOASBY*
Affiliation:
Division of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
*
*Email: b.j.loasby@stir.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Ronald Coase's work and its reception illustrate the significance – and the difficulty – of identifying problems and proposing solutions, which provides the theme of this paper. His theoretical innovation was not derived from economics, and seemed irrelevant to contemporary issues of economic theory and policy; only his much later perception of an apparently unrelated problem – the incoherent treatment of social cost as market failure – showed how the concept of transaction costs could illuminate two major areas of economics. The inadequate treatment by economists of the transaction costs of markets is linked to the neglect of processes, and especially the processes of organising the growth and use of knowledge – key concerns of Smith and Marshall. The curious relationship between Coase's explanation of firms and Austin Robinson's analysis of competitive industry leads to a reflection on the scarce resource of human cognition and the role (and fallibility) of institutions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 11 , Issue 2: Ronald H. Coase Memorial Issue , June 2015 , pp. 245 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, P. W. S. (1949), Manufacturing Business, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barnard, C. (1938), The Functions of the Executive, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Becattini, G. (2006), ‘The Marshallian School of Economics’, in Raffaelli, T., Becattini, G. and Dardi, M. (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Alfred Marshall, Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 609–616.Google Scholar
Casson, M. (1982), The Entrepreneur, Oxford: Martin Robertson, 2nd edn, 2003, Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Coase, R. ([1937] 1988), ‘The Nature of the Firm’, in The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
Coase, R. ([1960] 1988), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, in The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 75–156.Google Scholar
Coase, R. ([1972] 1988), ‘Industrial Organization: A Proposal for Research’, in The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1988), ‘The Firm, the Market and the Law’, in The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1991a), ‘The Nature of the Firm: Origin’, in Williamson, Oliver E. and Winter, Sidney G. (eds.), The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution and Development, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 34–47.Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1991b), ‘The Nature of the Firm: Influence’, in Williamson, Oliver E. and Winter, Sidney G. (eds.), The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution and Development, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 61–74.Google Scholar
Creedy, J. (2013), ‘John Richard Hicks 1904–1989’, in Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the British Academy XII, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, pp. 215–234.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (1952), The Sensory Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, L. (2008), On Robinson, Coase, and the ‘Nature of the Firm’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 30 (1): 65–80.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. (1973), Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Loasby, B. (2011), ‘Uncertainty and Imagination, Illusion and Order’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 35 (4): 771–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. (1919), Industry and Trade, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1920), Principles of Economics, 8th edn, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1994), Ye Machine, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Archival Supplement 4, Greenwich CT: JAI Press, pp. 116–132.Google Scholar
Meade, J. (1936), An Introduction to Economic Analysis and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ménard, C. (1994), ‘Organizations as Co-Ordinating Devices’, Metroeconomica, 45 (4): 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menger, C. (1976), Principles of Economics, Translated by Dingwall, J. and Hoselitz, B., New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 3rd edn, 1995, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, T. (2003), Marshall's Evolutionary Economics, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. (1960), Information and Investment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. (1972), ‘The Organization of Industry’, Economic Journal 82 (327): 883–896.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. (1975), ‘Adam Smith on Competition and Increasing Returns’, in Wilson, T. and Skinner, A. (eds.), Essays on Adam Smith, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 350–360.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. (1998), ‘Some Principles of Economic Organisation’, in Foss, N. and Loasby, B. (eds.), Economic Organization, Capabilities and Co-ordination: Essays in Honour of G. B. Richardson, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. (1931), The Structure of Competitive Industry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (1933), The Economics of Imperfect Competition, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. (1934), ‘The Problem of Management and the Size of Firms’, Economic Journal 44 (172): 242–257.Google Scholar
Robinson, E.(1950), ‘The Pricing of Manufactured Products’, Economic Journal, 60 (240): 771–780.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (1951), Collected Economic Papers, Vol. 1, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. (1990), ‘Prologue’, in Tulberg, Rita M. (ed.), Alfred Marshall in Retrospect, Aldershot UK and Brookfield, VT, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. (1967), The Years of High Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. (1970), Expectation, Enterprise and Profit: The Theory of the Firm, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. (1972), Epistemics and Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. ([1962] 1969), ‘The Architecture of Complexity’, in The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 84–118.Google Scholar
Smith, A. ([1759] 1976a), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, eds. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. ([1776] 1976b), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, eds. Campbell, R. H., Skinner, A. S. and Todd, W. B., 2 volumes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. ([1795] 1980), ‘The Principles which Lead and Direct Philosophical Enquiries: Illustrated by the History of Astronomy’, in Wightman, W. P. D. (ed.), Essays on Philosophical Subjects, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–105.Google Scholar
Smith, V. (2003), ‘Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics’, American Economic Review, 93 (3): 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1926), ‘The Laws of Return Under Competitive Conditions’, Economic Journal, 36 (144): 535–550.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. and Boulding, K. (eds.), (1953), Readings in Price Theory, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Young, A. (1928), ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Progress’, Economic Journal 38 (152): 527–542.Google Scholar