Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:43:37.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Information will be the key to successful implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2015

Peter Littlejohns  and
Kalipso Chalkidou
Peter Littlejohns*
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, International and King’s CollegeLondon, UK
Kalipso Chalkidou
Affiliation:
NICE International, King’s College London, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Professor Peter Littlejohns, Professor of Public Health, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, King’s College London, 5th Floor, Capital House, Guy's, SE1 3QD, London, UK. Email: peter.littlejohns@kcl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage [UHC; World Health Organization (WHO), 2014] is to be welcomed because tackling the relationship between cost-effectiveness and fairness has been given too little attention in policy-making. The consensus that universal coverage is a good thing quickly disperses as the concept is translated into working national policies and local delivery processes. As Weale (2014) and Rumbold and Wilson (2014) point out, seeking practical solutions can lead to the re-exploration of previous givens and result in unexpected ethical and philosophical consequences. While the basic premise underlying the discussion on the ethics of resource concurs with the view that equity is always at odds with efficiency, this is not inevitable as the authors of the report point out in their analysis – a view more fully explored by Culyer (2006). The present report is a welcome attempt to reconcile, as countries progress to UHC, ethical norms with the reality of setting priorities, involving what to pay for and under what circumstances.

Type
Special Section
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 85 - 89
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bobadilla, J.-L., Cowley, P., Musgrove, P. and Saxenian, H. (1994), ‘Design, content and financing of an essential national package of health services’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 72(4): 653–662.Google Scholar
Culyer, A. J. (2006), ‘The bogus conflict between efficiency and vertical equity’, Health Economics, 15(11): 1155–1158.Google Scholar
Culyer, A. J., McCabe, C., Briggs, A., Claxton, K., Buxton, M., Akehurst, R., Sculpher, M. and Brazier, J. (2007), ‘Searching for a threshold, not setting one: the role of the national institute for health and clinical excellence’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 12(1): 56–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, S. and Littlejohns, P. (2011), ‘Disinvestment from low value services: nicely done’, BMJ, 343: d4519.Google Scholar
Longworth, L., et al. (2009), MRC-NICE Scoping Project: Identifying the National Institute For Health And Clinical Excellence’s Methodological Research Priorities and an Initial Set of Priorities, University of York: Centre for Health Economics, CHE Research Paper 51. https://www.york.ac.uk/che/pdf/rp51.pdf [28 August 2014].Google Scholar
McCabe, C., Claxton, K. and Culyer, A. J. (2008), ‘The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold’, Pharmacoeconomics, 26(9): 733–744.Google Scholar
Revill, P., Asaria, M., Phillips, A., Gibb, D. M. and Gilks, C. F. (2014), WHO Decides What Is Fair? International HIV Treatment Guidelines, Social Value Judgements and Equitable Provision of Lifesaving Antiretroviral Therapy, University of York: Centre for Health Economics, CHE Research Paper 99. http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/researchpapers/CHERP99_International_HIV_Guidelines_ART.pdf [28 August 2014].Google Scholar
Rumbold, B. and Wilson, J. (2014), ‘Reasonable disagreement and the generally unacceptable’, Health, Economics, Poilcy and Law, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Tantivess, S., Werayingyong, P., Chuengsaman, P. and Teerawattananon, Y. (2013), ‘Universal coverage of renal dialysis in Thailand: promise, progress and prospects’, British Medical Journal, 346: f462.Google Scholar
Vorhoeve, A., Ottersen, T. and Norheim, O. (2014), ‘Response to our critics’, Health, Economics, Policy and Law, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Weale, A. (2014), ‘The path from nowhere?’, Health, Economics, Policy and Law, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Weale, A. and Littlejohns, P. (2014), ‘Why Is NICE Saying “Yes” So Often?’, http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g4603/rapid-responses [19 December 2014].Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2014), Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage, Geneva: World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112671/1/9789241507158_eng.pdf?ua=1 [27 July 2014].Google Scholar
World Health Organization/The World Bank (2013), Monitoring Progress towards Universal Health Coverage at Country and Global Levels: A Framework. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/country_monitoring_evaluation/UHC_WBG_DiscussionPaper_Dec2013.pdf [28 August 2014].Google Scholar