Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:02:28.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The prospects of deliberative global governance in the G20: legitimacy, accountability, and public contestation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2012

STEVEN SLAUGHTER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article contends that the ‘G’ system struggles to play a legitimate and effective role in global governance and argues that the G20 could play a important role if the forum was more publically accountable. This article argues that because of increasing forms of public contestation, the broadening agenda of the G8 and G20 and the uncertain status of global cooperation, that the legitimacy of the ‘G’ system is being questioned. As such, it is appropriate to consider deliberative avenues whereby public views could be considered by the G20 in a systematic way to foster forms of accountability. This consideration is animated by deliberative democracy theory and republican theory which advance a normative agenda which seeks to transform governance structures by enhancing the role of deliberation and public reasoning in political life. The article outlines the development of the ‘G’ system's legitimacy, considers possible modes of accountability and public involvement with respect to the G20 and examines the implications of more formalised public deliberation with respect to the G20.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 71 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cooper, A., ‘The G20 as an Improvised Crisis Committee and/or a Contested “Steering Committee” for the World’, International Affairs, 86:3 (2010), p. 742CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 O'Brien, Robert, et al. (eds) Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Dobson, Hugo, The Group of 7/8 (New York: Routledge, 2007), p. 60Google Scholar.

4 Financial Times, ‘A Bad Year for Global Governance’ (29 December 2010).

5 Brassett, James and Smith, William, ‘Deliberation and Global Governance: Liberal, Cosmopolitan and Critical Perspectives’, Ethics and International Affairs, 22:1 (2008), pp. 69–92Google Scholar; Germain, Randall, ‘Financial Governance and Transnational Deliberative Democracy’, Review of International Studies, 36:2 (2010), pp. 493–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Petitt, Philip, ‘Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma, and Republican Theory’, in Fishkin, James and Laslett, Peter (eds), Debating Deliberative Democracy (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003), pp. 138–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dryzek, John S., Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

6 Brassett and Smith, ‘Deliberation and Global Governance’, p. 84.

7 Germain, ‘Financial Governance’, p. 501.

8 Nicholas Bayne, ‘The G8 and the Globalisation Challenge’, Paper presented at the Academic Symposium G8 2000 (Okinawa, 2000).

9 Cooper, ‘The G20’, p. 747.

10 Dobson, The Group of 7/8, p. 89.

11 Cooper, ‘The G20’, p. 741.

12 Beeson, M. and Bell, S., ‘The G20 and International Economic Governance: Hegemony, Collectivism or Both?’, Global Governance, 15:1 (2009), p. 67Google Scholar.

13 Cooper, ‘The G20’, p. 743.

14 Hammer, Michael, ‘The time is now’, One World Trust Briefing Paper, 118 (2009), p. 1Google Scholar. See also Dobson, ‘The Group of 7/8’, p. 34.

15 Beeson and Bell, ‘The G20 and International Economic Governance’, p. 69.

16 Cox, Robert, Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Ibid.

18 Beeson and Bell, ‘The G20 and International Economic Governance’, pp. 81–2. See also Cooper, ‘The G20’.

19 John Kirton, What is the G20? Paper presented at an International Think Tank Forum on ‘China in the Twenty-First Century’ (Toronto: University of Toronto, 1999).

20 G7, ‘Statement of G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors’, Washington (25 September 1999).

21 Cooper, ‘The G20’, p. 748.

22 Ibid., p. 756.

23 Dobson, ‘The Group of 7/8’, p. 84.

24 Cooper, A. and Bradford, C., The G20 and the Post-Crisis Economic Order (Ontario: The Centre for International Governance Innovation, 2010), p. 11Google Scholar.

25 Ibid.

26 Clark, Ian, ‘Legitimacy in a Global Order’, Review of International Studies, 29 (2003), p. 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Symons, Jonathan, ‘The legitimation of international organisations: examining the identity of the communities that grant legitimacy’, Review of International Studies, 37.SI (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Buchanan, Allen and Keohane, Robert O., ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, Ethics and International Affairs, 20:4 (2006), p. 407CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘International Crises of Legitimacy’, International Politics, 44 (2007), pp. 163–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Ibid., pp. 171–2.

30 Symons, ‘The legitimation of international organisations’, pp. 14–15.

31 Ibid.; Clark, ‘Legitimacy’, p. 95.

32 Held, David, ‘Reframing Global Governance: Apocalypse soon or reform!’, New Political Economy, 11:2 (2006), p. 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Blagescu, M., de las Casas, L., and Lloyd, R., Pathways to Accountability: The GAP Framework (London: One World Trust, 2005), p. 13Google Scholar.

34 Clark, ‘Legitimacy’, p. 94.

35 Keohane, Robert, ‘Accountability in World Politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 29:2 (2006), p. 78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Ibid.

37 Ibid., p. 79.

38 Ibid. See also Keohane, Robert, ‘Global Governance and Democratic Accountability’, in Held, David and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (eds), Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance (London: Polity Press, 2003), pp. 130–59Google Scholar.

39 Ibid., p. 143.

40 Daniele Archibugi, ‘The G20 ought to be increased to 6 Billion’, openDemocracy (London, 2009).

41 G20, ‘London Summit Leaders’ Statement’ (2 April 2009), para. 3.

42 Held, David, Democracy and the Global Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

43 Archibugi, ‘The G20’.

44 Symons, ‘The legitimation of international organisations’, p. 7.

45 Dryzek, John and Niemeyer, Simon, ‘Discursive Representation’, American Political Science Review, 102:4 (2008), p. 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Cornell, Cornell University Press, 1998), chap. 1Google Scholar. See also Scholte, Jan Aart, ‘Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance’, Global Governance, 8:3 (2002), pp. 281–304Google Scholar.

47 Keohane, ‘Global Governance’, p. 148.

48 Clifford Bob, ‘Merchants of Morality’, Foreign Policy, 129 (Mar./Apr. 2002), pp. 36–45.

49 Cooper, ‘The G20’, p. 756.

50 Ibid., p. 744.

51 Blagescu, et al, ‘Pathways’, p. 11.

52 Ibid.

53 Ibid., pp. 23–4.

54 Reus-Smit, ‘International Crises’, p. 172.

55 Ibid.

56 Buchanan and Keohane, ‘Legitimacy’, p. 407.

57 Brassett and Smith, ‘Deliberation and Global Governance’, p. 72 and Dryzek, Deliberative Global Politics.

58 Stokes, Geoffrey, ‘Critical theories of Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Citizenship’, in Leib, Ethan J. and He, Baogang (eds), Search for Deliberative Democracy in China (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), p. 66Google Scholar; and Pettit, ‘Deliberative Democracy’, pp. 139–40

59 Stokes, ‘Critical theories’, p. 54.

60 Ibid., p. 66.

61 Germain, ‘Financial Governance’, p. 498.

62 Stokes, ‘Critical theories’, p. 55.

63 Ibid., p. 68. See also Dryzek Deliberative Global Politics.

64 Pettit, ‘Deliberative Democracy’, pp. 152–3.

65 Blagescu, et al., ‘Pathways’, p. 23.

66 Dryzek, John, ‘Global Democratization: Soup, Society, or System?’, Ethics & International Affairs, 25:2 (2011), pp. 211–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Goodin, Robert, ‘Global Democracy: In the Beginning’, International Theory, 2:2 (2010), pp. 175–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Goodin, ‘Global Democracy’, p. 179.

68 Brassett and Smith, ‘Deliberation and Global Governance’ and Germain, ‘Financial Governance’.

69 Dryzek, Deliberative Global Politics, p. 154.

70 Brassett and Smith, ‘Deliberation and Global Governance’, p. 72. See also Germain, ‘Financial Governance’, p. 499.

71 Pettit, Phillip, ‘Republican Freedom and Contestatory Democratization’, in Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano (eds), Democracy's Value (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 163–90Google Scholar.

72 Pettit, ‘Deliberative Democracy’.

73 Pettit, Philip, ‘Two-dimensional Democracy, National and International’, IILJ Working Paper, 8 (2005), pp. 14–15Google Scholar.

74 Ibid., pp. 16–20.

75 Bob, ‘Merchants of Morality’.

76 Dryzek, Deliberative Global Politics.

77 Dryzek and Niemeyer, ‘Discursive Representation’, p. 485.

78 Ibid., p. 491.

79 Keohane, ‘Accountability’, p. 84.

80 Keohane, ‘Global Governance’, p. 146.

81 Brassett and Smith, ‘Deliberation and Global Governance’, p. 499.

82 Ibid., pp. 500–1.

83 Brassett, James and Smith, William, ‘Deliberation and Global Civil Society: Agency, Arena, Affect’, Review of International Studies, 36:2 (2010), p. 422CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Ibid., p. 418. See also Keck and Sikkink, ‘Activists’, chap. 1.

85 Keohane, ‘Global Governance’, p. 152.

86 Cooper and Bradford, The G20, p. 5.

87 Dobson, The group of 7/8, pp. 82–3.

88 Cooper, ‘The G20’, p. 756.

89 Ibid., pp. 85–6.

90 G8, ‘Gleneagles Communique on Africa, Climate Change, Energy and Sustainable Development’ (8 July 2005), sections 27 and 28.

91 Keohane, ‘Global Governance’, p. 130.

92 Hammer, ‘The time is now’, p. 1.

93 Germain, ‘Financial Governance’, p. 509.