Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:39:49.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Decline and Diversity: The Us versus the Us's

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2010

Barbara Arneil
Barbara Arneil*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
Barbara Arneil, Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia, arneil@interchange.ubc.ca. Political Science Department, 1866 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. In the last 20 years, the idea that the social realm is under threat of decline or collapse has been a central theme in academic literature and political analysis. In this short paper I explore the meaning of social decline and its relationship to multiculturalism and diversity. Using the twin notions of participation and trust as two key measures of social decline, I argue that participation has not so much declined over the last 40 years (as Robert Putnam, for example, has argued) as it has changed because of what I call the politics of the us's—groups historically oppressed (including women, ethnic and racialized minorities and gay, lesbian and disabled citizens) who have created new kinds of advocacy organizations in order to change the norms of civil society itself. I also argue that such changes (while often perceived as negative in relation to a transcendent “us”) are positive to the extent that they have made society more inclusive, respectful of diversity and just. Trust, on the other hand, has declined but, I argue, this is also due to the politics of diversity as the us's fought for change and other groups responded by defending traditional norms and values, often in the name of a transcendental us, creating a vicious circle of distrust as each side feels betrayed by the other's victories. Thus, I conclude, to understand social decline, in terms of participation and trust, we must pay attention not only to the us but also to the us's in civil society. The tendency, therefore, to champion a transcendent us in order to reverse social decline, as many scholars and politicians seem prone to do in recent years, not only ignores the us's but may foreclose on their hope for a future free from discrimination and hate.

Résumé. Au cours des vingt dernières années, l'idée que le champ social est menacé de déclin ou d'effondrement a été un thème central dans la littérature académique et l'analyse politique. Dans ce court article, j'explore la signification du déclin social et sa relation avec le multiculturalisme et la diversité. En utilisant les notions liées de participation et de confiance en tant que deux mesures principales du déclin social, j'avance que la participation n'a pas tellement diminué au cours des quarante dernières années (comme le soutient Robert Putnam, par exemple), mais qu'elle a plutôt changé en raison de ce que j'appelle la politique des nous – soit des groupes longtemps opprimés (comprenant les femmes, les minorités ethniques et racialisées, ainsi que les gais, les lesbiennes et les personnes handicapées) qui ont créé de nouveaux types d'organismes représentatifs afin de changer les normes de la société civile. Je soutiens également que de tels changements (souvent perçus négativement par rapport à un «nous» transcendant) sont positifs dans la mesure où ils ont permis à la société de devenir plus inclusive, plus respectueuse de la diversité et plus juste. D'autre part, la confiance a effectivement diminué, mais je soutiens que c'est également en raison de la politique de la diversité, car les nous ont lutté pour faire changer les choses et d'autres groupes ont réagi en défendant les normes et les valeurs traditionnelles, souvent au nom d'un «nous» transcendant – créant ainsi un cercle vicieux de méfiance où chaque côté se sent trahi par les victoires de l'autre. Je conclus donc que pour comprendre le déclin social, en termes de participation et de confiance, nous devons porter attention non seulement au «nous», mais également aux nous dans la société civile. Par conséquent, la tendance à prôner un «nous» transcendant afin de renverser le déclin social, comme le font plusieurs chercheurs et politiciens ces dernières années, en plus d'ignorer les nous, peut aussi éteindre leur espoir d'un avenir libre de discrimination et de haine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 43 , Issue 2: Diversity and Democratic Politics , June 2010 , pp. 273 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E.. 2002. “Who Trusts Others?” Journal of Public Economics 85: 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. 2006 Diverse Communities. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. 2010. “Gender, Diversity and Organizational Change: The Boy Scouts vs. Girl Scouts of America.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, Keith and Kymlicka, Will. 2004. “Do Multiculturalism Policies Erode the Welfare State?” In Cultural Diversity versus Economic Solidarity, ed. van Parijs, Philippe. Brussels: De Boeck University Press.Google Scholar
Banting, Keith and Kymlicka, Will. 2006. Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, Keith, Kymlicka, Will, Soroka, Stuart and Johnston, Richard. 2006. “Do Multiculturalism Policies Erode the Welfare State? An Empirical Analysis.” In Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Advanced Democracies, ed. Banting, Keith and Kymlicka, Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian. 2001. Culture and Equality. An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge MA: Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
Bloemraad, Irene. 2006. Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, D.L. and Kahn, M.E.. 2003. “Civic Engagement and Community Heterogeneity: An Economist's Perspective.” Perspectives on Politics 1: 103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faludi, Susan. 2000. Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American Man. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Gitlin, Todd. 1995. The Twilight of Common Dreams: Why America is Wracked by Culture Wars. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Goodhart, David. 2004a. “Too Diverse.” Prospect 95 (February): 30–37Google Scholar
Goodhart, David. 2004b. “Discomfort of Strangers.” The Guardian (Manchester), February 24. http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1154650,00. (Accessed January 2008).Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1999. “Social Capital in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 28: 417–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter. 2002. “The Role of Government and the Distribution of Social Capital.” In Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, ed. Putnam, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helliwell, John. 2003. “Immigration and Social Capital.” Issues paper for the OECD/PRI Conference on Immigration and Social Capital, Montreal.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Marc, Reeskens, Tim and Stolle, Dietland. 2007. “Diversity, Multiculturalism and Social Cohesion: Trust and Ethnocentrism in European Societies.” In Belonging? Diversity, Recognition and Shared Citizenship in Canada, ed. Banting, Keith, Courchene, Thomas and Seidle, Leslie. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon and Peffley, Mark. 2010. “And Justice for Some: Race, Crime and Punishment in the US Criminal Justice System.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 457–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2004. “The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy.” British Journal of Sociology 55 (2): 237–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katznelson, Ira. 2005. “New Deal, Raw Deal: How Aid Became Affirmative Action for Whites.” Washington Post, September 27. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2005/09/27/AR2005092700484.html, (Accessed February 2008).Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2010. “Testing the Liberal Multiculturalist Hypothesis? Normative Theories and Social Science Evidence.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, Everett. 1996. “The Data Just Don't Show Erosion of America's ‘Social Capital.’” The Public Perspective June/Jul: 1–22.Google Scholar
Ladd, Everett. 1999. The Ladd Report. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Lowndes, Vivien. 2000. “Women and Social Capital: A Comment on Hall's ‘Social Capital in Britain.’” British Journal of Political Science 30: 533–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. 2004. “Social Justice in Multicultural Societies.” In Cultural Diversity versus Economic Solidarity, ed. van Parijs, Phillippe. Brussels: De Boeck University Press.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2001. The Well-Being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. Centre for Educational Research and Education.Google Scholar
Patterson, Orlando. 1999. “Liberty Against the Democratic State: On the Historical and Contemporary Source of American Distrust.” In Democracy and Trust, ed. Warren, Mark E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Trevor. 2004. “Multiculturalism's legacy is ‘have a nice day’ racism: the mere celebration of diversity does nothing to redress inequality.” The Guardian (Manchester), May 28, http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1226527,00. (Accessed January 2008).Google Scholar
Policy Research Initiative, Privy Council Office, Government of Canada (PRI) 2003: “Social Capital Building on a Network-based Analysis,” Draft discussion paper, October, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Policy Research Initiative, Privy Council Office, Government of Canada (PRI). 2004. “Expert Workshop on the Measurement of Social Capital for Public Policy.” Synthesis report, June, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century.” The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (2): 137–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 2000. “Is ‘Cultural Recognition’ a Useful Concept for Leftist Politics?” Critical Horizons 1 (1): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1999. “Recent Transformations of Civic Life.” In Civic Engagement in American Democracy, ed. Skocpol, Theda and Fiorina, Morris P.. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2002. “From Membership to Advocacy.” In Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, ed. Putnam, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind and Harell, Allison. 2009. “Social Capital and Ethno-Racial Diversity: Learning to Trust in a Diverse Society.” Paper presented at the workshop, “Diversity and Democratic Politics: Canada in Comparative Perspective,” at Queen's University, Kingston ON.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind, Soroka, Stuart and Johnston, Richard. 2008. “When Does Diversity Erode Trust? Neighborhood Diversity, Interpersonal Trust and the Mediating Effect of Social Interactions.” Political Studies 56 (1): 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1992. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition, ed. Gutmann, A.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric. 2006. “Does Diversity Drive Down Trust?” FEEM working paper no. 69. http://ssrn.com/abstract=903051 (Accessed February 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Alan and Klausen, Jytte. 1997. “Identity Politics and the Welfare State.” Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (2): 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 2002. “Bridging the Privileged and the Marginalized?” In Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, ed. Putnam, Robert and Goss, Kristin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar