Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:10:19.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of oil and gas drilling in Trinidad: factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviours within three rural wetland communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2009

A. KAREN BAPTISTE  and
BRENDA J NORDENSTAM
A. KAREN BAPTISTE*
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, Room 305, 113 Euclid Ave, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA
BRENDA J NORDENSTAM
Affiliation:
State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 110A Marshall Hall, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
*
*Correspondence: Dr A. Karen Baptiste Tel: +1 315 443 0284 Fax: +1 315 443 1725 e-mail: akbaptis@syr.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Oil and gas development generates socio-ecological consequences for coastal ecosystems. Within the Caribbean region, rural communities depend heavily on wetland resources, however attitudes and beliefs of these communities regarding the impacts of oil and gas drilling are ambiguous. This paper assesses factors influencing attitudes and behaviours among rural communities of the Nariva Swamp (Trinidad) toward oil development. Interviews and structured questionnaires indicated varying levels of beliefs, concerns and behaviours based on distance of the village from the swamp, gender and type of livelihood the respondent engaged in. Villagers who lived in closer proximity to the swamp demonstrated the greatest health and environmental concerns, pro-environmental beliefs and behaviours, probably due to their greater dependence on the resource for livelihoods. Females illustrated a higher affinity for altruistic and egoistic concerns, while males, engaged in outdoor employment and recreational opportunities, demonstrated greater biospheric concerns and environmental behaviours. Given their intimacy with the natural environment, farmers engaged in environmental behaviours to a greater extent than other groups within the villages. The varying levels of beliefs, concerns and behaviours among villagers toward drilling should be given full consideration by public officials, industrial managers and other decision makers when addressing resource management.

Keywords

behaviourenvironmental attitudeoil and gas drillingrural communitiesTrinidadwetlands
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 14 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C.C. (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27: 629–649.Google Scholar
Bacon, P. (1993) Mangroves in the Lesser Antilles, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago. In: Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Mangrove Forests in Latin America and Africa Regions. Part I – Latin America and the Caribbean, ed. Diop, E.D., pp. 155–209. Okinawa, Japan: International Tropical Timber Organization.Google Scholar
Ballard, C. & Banks, G. (2003) Resource wars: the anthropology of mining. Annual Reviews of Anthropology 32: 287–313.Google Scholar
Blocker, J.T. & Eckberg, D.L. (1989) Environmental issues as women's issues: general concerns and local hazards. Social Science Quarterly 70: 586–593.Google Scholar
Bord, R.J. & O'Conner, R.E. (1997) The gender gap in environmental attitudes: the case of perceived vulnerability to risk. Social Science Quarterly 78: 830–840.Google Scholar
Burns, K.A., Garrity, S.D. & Levings, S.C. (1993) How many years until mangrove ecosystems recover from catastrophic oil spills? Marine Pollution Bulletin 26: 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttel, F. & Flinn, W. (1974) The structure of support for the environmental movement, 1968–1970. Rural Sociology 39: 56–69.Google Scholar
Buttel, F.H. & Flinn, W.L. (1978) Social class and mass environmental beliefs: a reconsideration. Environment and Behavior 10: 433–450.Google Scholar
Carbonell, M., Alleng, G., Browne, D. & Massey, B. (2007) Nariva Swamp Restoration Initiative, Trinidad and Tobago. Memphis, USA: Ducks Unlimited Inc.Google Scholar
Carbonell, M. & Nathai-Gyan, N. (2005) Nariva Swamp Ramsar Site, Trinidad and Tobago (West Indies) Wetland Habitat Restoration Initiative [www document]. URL http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr191/Asilomar/pdfs/446-449.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cornell Local Government Program (1998) Long Islanders and the environment of the south shore: a survey of public opinion [www document]. URL http://www.nyswaterfronts.com/Final_Draft_HTML/Tech_Report_HTM/PDFs/Chap6/Public_Perceptions_Ex_Summ.pdfGoogle Scholar
Corral-Verdugo, V. & Armendariz, L.I. (2000) The ‘environmental paradigm’ in a Mexican community. Journal of Environmental Education 31: 25–31.Google Scholar
Davidson, D.J. & Freudenburg, W.R. (1996) Gender and environmental risk concerns: a review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior 28: 302–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, T., Dan, A. & Shwom, R. (2007) Support for climate change policy, social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology 72: 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, T., Stern, P. & Guagnano, G. (1998) Social structure and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 30: 450–472.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R., Gallup, G. & Gallup, A. (1993) Of global concern: results of a health of the planet survey. Environment 35: 7–39.Google Scholar
Ellison, A.M. & Farnsworth, E.J. (1996) Anthropogenic disturbance of caribbean mangrove ecosystems: past impacts, present trends and future predictions. Biotropica 28: 549–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, W. & Davidson, D.J. (2007) Nuclear families and nuclear risks: the effects of gender, geography, and progeny on attitudes toward a nuclear waste facility. Rural Sociology 72: 215–243.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, W.R. (1991) Rural-urban differences in environmental concern: a closer look. Sociological Inquiry 61: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furman, A. (1998) A note on environmental concern in a developing country: results from an Istanbul survey. Environment and Behavior 30: 520–534.Google Scholar
Gibson, C.C. & Marks, S.A. (1995) Transforming rural hunters into conservationists: an assessment of community based wildlife management programs in Africa. World Development 23: 941–957.Google Scholar
Gillingham, S. & Lee, P.C. (1999) The impact of wildlife related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation 26: 218–228.Google Scholar
Gopal, B. (1990) Wetland (mis)management by keeping people out: two examples from India. In: People's Role in Wetland Management, ed. Marchand, M. & Udo De Haes, H.A., pp. 352–360. Leiden, Netherlands: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. & Wellman, K. (2001) Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: a community based estuary case study. Ecological Economics 39: 37–52.Google Scholar
Gumonye-Mafabi, P. (1990) The role of public awareness on wetland management. In: People's Role in Wetland Management, ed. Marchand, M. & Udo De Haes, H.A., pp. 460–468. Leiden, Netherlands: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Hendee, J. (1969) Rural-urban differences reflected in outdoor recreation participation. Journal of Leisure Research 1: 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacal, S.A. (1999) Social Assessment and Community Action Plan of Nariva Managed Resource Area. Port of Spain, Trinidad: Ministry of Agriculture, Land and Marine Resources, Government of Trinidad and Tobago.Google Scholar
Lacerda, L.D., Conde, J.E., Alarcon, C., Alvarez-Leon, R., Bacon, P.R., D'Croz, L., Kjerfve, B., Polaina, J. & Vannucci, M. (1993) Mangrove ecosystems of Latin America and the Caribbean: a summary. In: Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Mangrove Forests in Latin America and Africa Regions. Part I – Latin America and the Caribbean, ed. Diop, E.D., pp. 1–42.Okinawa, Japan: International Tropical Timber Organization.Google Scholar
Lowe, G.D., Pinhey, T.K. & Grimes, M.D. (1980) Public support for environmental protection: new evidence from national surveys. Pacific Sociological Review 23: 423–445.Google Scholar
Mehta, J.N. & Heinen, J.T. (2001) Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental Management 28: 166–177.Google Scholar
Mehta, J.N. & Kellert, S.R. (1998) Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area. Environmental Conservation 25: 320–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathai-Gyan, N. (1996) Conservation status of the Nariva Swamp. In: Caribbean Forest Conservation Association, Nariva Swamp Seminar, pp. 3–6. St Augustine, Trinidad: University of the West Indies.Google Scholar
Perrings, C. & Hannon, B. (2001) An introduction to spatial discounting. Journal of Regional Science 41: 23–38.Google Scholar
Ramsar Convention Bureau (2002) Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Resolution VIII.31 on The Convention's CEPA programme: The Convention's programme on communication, education and public awareness (CEPA) 2003–2008 [www Document]. URL http://www.ramsar.org/res/key_res_viii_31_e.htmGoogle Scholar
Ramsar Convention Secretariat (1995) Ramsar Advisory Missions Report: Nariva Swamp. No 35 [www Document]. URL http://www.ramsar.org/ram/ram_rpt_35e.htmGoogle Scholar
Rauwald, K.S. & Moore, C.E. (2002) Environmental attitudes as predictors of policy support across three countries. Environment and Behavior 34: 709–739.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, A. (1981) Marine and coastal environmental stress in the wider Caribbean region. Ambio 10: 283–294.Google Scholar
Sah, J.P. & Heinen, J.T. (2001) Wetland resource use and conservation attitudes among indigenous and migrant peoples in Ghodaghoni Lake area, Nepal. Environmental Conservation, 28: 345–356.Google Scholar
Schmitt, T. (2003) Emotional bonds with nature as determinant of environmental awareness: the missing link for saving our environment? [www document]. URL http://www.lumes.lu.se/database/alumni/02.03/theses/schmitt_tobias.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schultz, P.W. (2000) Empathizing with nature: the effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues 56: 391–406.Google Scholar
Schultz, P.W. (2001) Assessing the structure of environmental concern: concern for the self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekhar, N.U. (2003) Local people's attitudes toward conservation and wildlife tourism around Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management 69: 339–347.Google Scholar
Silvius, M.J., Oneka, M. & Verhagen, A. (2000) Wetlands: lifeline for people at the edge. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere 25: 645–652.Google Scholar
Stern, P. (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56: 407–424.Google Scholar
Stern, P., Dietz, T. & Guagnano, G. (1995) The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior 27: 723–743.Google Scholar
Stern, P., Dietz, T. & Kalof, L. (1993) Value orientations, gender and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 25: 322–348.Google Scholar
Tremblay, K.R. & Dunlap, R.E. (1978) Rural-urban residence and concern with environmental quality: a replication and extension. Rural Sociology 43: 474–491.Google Scholar
Tuna, M. (2004) Public environmental attitudes in Turkey [www document]. URL http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/ptb/ejgc/ejgc3/tuna%20paper.pdfGoogle Scholar
Zelezny, L., Chua, P. & Aldrich, C. (2000) Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 56: 443–445.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Baptiste and Nordenstam supplementary material

Supplementary tables and diagrams

Download Baptiste and Nordenstam supplementary material(File)
File 107.5 KB