Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:58:47.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orbit of a lunar artificial satellite: Analytical theory of perturbations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2005

B. De Saedeleer
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, FUNDP, Namur, B-5000, Belgium email: bernard.desaedeleer@fundp.ac.be, jacques.henrard@fundp.ac.be
J. Henrard
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, FUNDP, Namur, B-5000, Belgium email: bernard.desaedeleer@fundp.ac.be, jacques.henrard@fundp.ac.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We are currently developing an analytical theory of an artificial satellite of the Moon. It is an interesting problem because the dynamics of a lunar orbiter is quite different from that of an artificial satellite of the Earth, by at least two aspects: the $J_2$ lunar gravity term is only $1/10$ of the $C_{22}$ term and the third body effect of the Earth on the lunar satellite is much larger than the effect of the Moon on a terrestrial satellite. So we have to account at least for these larger perturbations. We use here the method of the Lie Transform as perturbation method. The Hamiltonian of the problem is first averaged over the fast angle, in canonical variables. The solution is developed in powers of the small factors linked to $ n_{\Moon}$, $J_2$, $C_{22}$ and to the Earth's position. The Earth location is determined by the lunar theory ELP2000 (Chapront-Touzé & Chapront 1991) from which we take the leading terms. Series developments are made with our home-made Algebraic Manipulator, the MM (standing for “Moon's series Manipulator”). The results are obtained in a closed form, without any series developments in eccentricity or inclination. So the solution applies for a wide range of values, except for few isolated critical values. We Achieved, among others, second order results for the combined effect of $J_2$ and $C_{22}$. As a side result, we were able to check the second order generator $\mathcal{W}_{2}$ given by Kozai for the effect of the $J_2$ term on an artificial satellite.To search for other articles by the author(s) go to: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© 2004 International Astronomical Union