Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:34:25.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. By Elena Anagnostopoulou. (Studies in Generative Grammar, 54). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003. Pp. xiv, 379. Hardcover. $114.40.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2005

GUNNAR HRAFN HRAFNBJARGARSON
GUNNAR HRAFN HRAFNBJARGARSON
Affiliation:
University of Oslo The Text Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, University of Oslo, P.O.Box 1102 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway [g.h.hrafnbjargarson@ilf.uio.no]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
REVIEWS
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 49 - 63
Copyright
© 2005 Society for Germanic Linguistics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker Mark. C. 2001. The atoms of language: The mind's hidden rules of grammar. New York: Basic Books.
Boeckx Cedric 2004. Review of The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics, by Elena Anagnostopoulou 2003. Journal of Linguistics 40. 149– 153.Google Scholar
Bonet Eulàlia 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance languages. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Bonet Eulàlia 1994. The person-case constraint: A morphological approach. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22: The morphology-syntax connection, 33– 52.
Chomsky Noam 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky Noam 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Step by step, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka, 89– 155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky Noam 2001. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1– 52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Christensen Ken Ramshøj. 2003a. NEG-shift and repair strategies: Pied piping vs. preposition stranding. Unpublished ms., University of Aarhus.
Christensen Ken Ramshøj. 2003b. NEG-shift in the Scandinavian languages and English. Unpublished ms., University of Aarhus.
Christensen Ken Ramshøj. 2003c. On the synchronic and diachronic status of the negative adverbial ikke ‘not’. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 72. 1– 53.Google Scholar
Collins Chris and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1996. VP-internal structure and object shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 391– 444.Google Scholar
D'Alessandro Roberta, A. G. 2003. Impersonal si constructions: Agreement and interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
Falk Cecilia 1990. On double object constructions. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 46. 53– 100.Google Scholar
Holmberg Anders 1991. On the Scandinavian double object construction. Papers from the 12th Scandinavian conference of linguistics, 141– 155. Reykjavík: Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland.
Holmberg Anders and Christer Platzack. 1995. The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holmberg Anders and Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir. 2003. Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions. Lingua 113. 997– 1019. (Republished as Holmberg and Hróarsdóttir 2004.)Google Scholar
Holmberg Anders and Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir. 2004. Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions. Lingua 114. 651– 673.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson Gunnar Hrafn 2004. Oblique subjects and stylistic fronting in the history of Scandinavian and English: The role of IP-Spec. Doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus.
Kayne Richard 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koch Christensen Kirsti 1991. AGR, adjunction, and the structure of Scandinavian existential sentences. Lingua 84. 137– 158.Google Scholar
Marantz Alec 1993. Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar, ed. by Sam A. Mchombo, 113– 150. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Perlmutter David M. 1971. Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Rinehart and Winston Inc.
Sigurðsson Halldór Ármann 1989. Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.
Sigurðsson Halldór Ármann 1996. Icelandic finite verb agreement. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57. 1– 46.Google Scholar