Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T18:36:52.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MULTICULTURALISM GOES IMPERIAL

Immigrants, Animals, and the Suppression of Moral Dialogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2008

Claire Jean Kim
Claire Jean Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Department of Asian American Studies, University of California, Irvine
*
Professor Claire Jean Kim, University of California, 3151 Social Science Plaza, Irvine, CA 92697. E-mail: cjkim@uci.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As Latino and Asian immigrant populations in the United States continue to grow, controversies are cropping up over immigrant animal practices such as horse tripping in Mexican charreadas (rodeos) and the slaughter of animals in the live-animal markets of San Francisco's Chinatown. Immigrant advocates read these controversies through a multiculturalist interpretive framework that constructs animal advocates as agents of an ethnocentric and racist majority. In this article, I argue that this multiculturalist interpretation tends to “go imperial” by mischaracterizing the position(s) of animal advocates and invalidating and suppressing the other, potentially competitive, moral discourse at play: the discourse about cruelty toward animals. I explicate this suppressed discourse and then propose the development of a mutually challenging and potentially edifying moral dialogue in which majority and minority animal practices are simultaneously open to scrutiny and criticism. Clashes over customary practices can aggravate intergroup tensions, but they also have the potential to lead to meaningful moral dialogue between the majority and immigrant minorities.

Keywords

MulticulturalismImmigrantsAnimalsMoral DiscourseCharreadaChinatown
Type
STATE OF THE DISCOURSE
Information
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , Spring 2007 , pp. 233 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Appiah, K. Anthony (1996). Race, Culture, Identity: Misunderstood Connections. In Appiah, K. Anthony and Gutmann, Amy (Eds.), Color Conscious: The Political Morality of Race, pp. 30–105. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Associate Press State and Local Wire (2000). Assembly Decides to Leave Regulation of Food Up to Locals. January 4.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (2001). Culture and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beers, Diane (2006). For the Prevention of Cruelty: The History and Legacy of Animal Rights Activism in the United States. Athens, OH: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (2002). The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal, Paula (2004). Justice Across Cultures: Animals and Accommodation. In Clayton, Matthew and Williams, Andrew (Eds.), Social Justice, pp. 241–263. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Contra Costa Times (1997). Suit Says S.F. Markets, Mostly in Chinatown, Break Cruelty Laws. April 16.Google Scholar
De León, Arnoldo (1998). Initial Contacts: Niggers, Redskins, and Greasers. In Delgado, Richard and Stefancic, Jean (Eds.), The Latino/a Condition: A Critical Reader, pp. 158–164. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard and Stefancic, Jean (1998). Racial Depiction in American Law and Culture. In Delgado, Richard and Stefancic, Jean (Eds.), The Latino/a Condition: A Critical Reader, pp. 209–214. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Elder, Glen, Wolch, Jennifer, and Emel, Jody (1998). Le Pratique Sauvage: Race, Place, and the Human-Animal Divide. In Wolch, Jennifer and Emel, Jody (Eds.), Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands, pp. 72–90. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Emel, Jody and Wolch, Jennifer (1998). Witnessing the Animal Moment. In Wolch, Jennifer and Emel, Jody (Eds.), Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands, pp. 1–26. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
Epstein, Edward (1997). Supervisor Calls Animal Rights Lawsuit Biased. San Francisco Chronicle, April 22.Google Scholar
Finsen, Lawrence and Finsen, Susan (1994). The Animal Rights Movement in America: From Compassion to Respect. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
Griffith, Marcie, Wolch, Jennifer, and Lassiter, Unna (2002). Animal Practices and the Racialization of Filipinas in Los Angeles. Society and Animals, 10(3): 221–248.Google Scholar
International Fund for Horses (2003). Horse Tripping: Fact Sheet. ⟨http://www.fund4horses.org/info.php?id=100⟩ (accessed March 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Lee, Robert (1999). Orientals: Asian Americans in Popular Culture. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Tom (2000). Assembly Bill Threatens Traditional Markets. AsianWeek Archives, May 25. ⟨http://www.asianweek.com/2000_05_25/bay_livefoodbill.html⟩ (accessed March 26, 2007).Google Scholar
McClain, Charles and McClain, Laurene Wu (1991). The Chinese Contribution to the Development of American Law. In Chan, Sucheng (Ed.), Entry Denied: Exclusion and the Chinese Community in America, 1882–1943, pp. 3–24. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Munro, Lyle (1999). Contesting Moral Capital in Campaigns Against Animal Liberation. Society and Animals, 7(1): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nájera-Ramírez, Olga (1994). Engendering Nationalism: Identity, Discourse, and the Mexican Charro. Anthropological Quarterly, 67(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Nájera-Ramírez, Olga (1996). The Racialization of a Debate: the Charreada as Tradition or Torture. American Anthropologist, 98(3): 505–511.Google Scholar
Nájera-Ramírez, Olga (2002). Haciendo Patria: La Charreada and the Formation of a Mexican Transnational Identity. In Vélez-Ibañez, Carlos, Sampaio, Anna, and González-Estay, Manolo (Eds.), Transnational Latina/o Communities: Politics, Processes, and Culture, pp. 168–180. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. ⟨http://anthro.ucsc.edu/olga_pdf/hacpatri.pdf⟩ (accessed March 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu (2000). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Philo, Chris (1995). Animals, Geography, and the City: Notes on Inclusions and Exclusions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13(6): 655–681.Google Scholar
Philo, Chris and Wilbert, Chris (2000). Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: An Introduction. In Philo, Chris and Wilbert, Chris (Eds.), Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human-Animal Relations, pp. 1–34. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plumwood, Val (1993). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Poultry Press (1997). San Francisco Live Animal Markets Sued! Summer. ⟨http://www.upc-online.org/summer97/su97sf_markets_sued.html⟩ (accessed March 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison (2004). The Cultural Defense. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
San Francisco Chronicle (1996). S.F. Official Blasts Idea of Animal Ban. October 3.Google Scholar
Shah, Nayan (2001). Contagious Divides: Epidemics and Race in San Francisco's Chinatown. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter (2002). Animal Liberation. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Snow, David and Benford, Robert (1988). Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1: 197–217.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar