Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:01:36.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Edge states as mediators of bypass transition in boundary-layer flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2016

T. Khapko
Affiliation:
Linné FLOW Centre, KTH Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SeRC), SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
T. Kreilos
Affiliation:
Emergent Complexity in Physical Systems Laboratory (ECPS), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
P. Schlatter*
Affiliation:
Linné FLOW Centre, KTH Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SeRC), SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Y. Duguet
Affiliation:
LIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91405 Orsay, France
B. Eckhardt
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Physik, Philipps-Universität Marburg, D-35032 Marburg, Germany J. M. Burgerscentrum, Delft University of Technology, NL-2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
D. S. Henningson
Affiliation:
Linné FLOW Centre, KTH Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SeRC), SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Email address for correspondence: pschlatt@mech.kth.se

Abstract

The concept of edge states is investigated in the asymptotic suction boundary layer in relation to the receptivity process to noisy perturbations and the nucleation of turbulent spots. Edge tracking is first performed numerically, without imposing any discrete symmetry, in a large computational domain allowing for full spatial localisation of the perturbation velocity. The edge state is a three-dimensional localised structure recurrently characterised by a single low-speed streak that experiences erratic bursts and planar shifts. This recurrent streaky structure is then compared with predecessors of individual spot nucleation events, triggered by non-localised initial noise. The present results suggest a nonlinear picture, rooted in dynamical systems theory, of the nucleation process of turbulent spots in boundary-layer flows, in which the localised edge state plays the role of state-space mediator.

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, P., Brandt, L., Bottaro, A. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 On the breakdown of boundary layer streaks. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 2960.Google Scholar
Antonia, R. A., Fulachier, L., Krishnamoorthy, L. V., Benabid, T. & Anselmet, F. 1988 Influence of wall suction on the organized motion in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 190, 217240.Google Scholar
Brandt, L., Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S. 2004 Transition in boundary layers subject to free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 517, 167198.Google Scholar
Cherubini, S., De Palma, P., Robinet, J. C. & Bottaro, A. 2011 Edge states in a boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 23, 051705.Google Scholar
Chevalier, M., Schlatter, P., Lundbladh, A. & Henningson, D. S.2007 A pseudo-spectral solver for incompressible boundary layer flows. Tech. Rep. TRITA-MEK 2007:07. KTH Mechanics, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Duguet, Y., Monokrousos, A., Brandt, L. & Henningson, D. S. 2013 Minimal transition thresholds in plane Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 25, 084103.Google Scholar
Duguet, Y., Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S. 2009 Localized edge states in plane Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 21, 111701.Google Scholar
Duguet, Y., Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S. 2010a Formation of turbulent patterns near the onset of transition in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 650, 119129.Google Scholar
Duguet, Y., Schlatter, P., Henningson, D. S. & Eckhardt, B. 2012 Self-sustained localized structures in a boundary-layer flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 044501.Google Scholar
Duguet, Y., Willis, A. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2010b Slug genesis in cylindrical pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 180208.Google Scholar
Emmons, H. W. 1951 The laminar–turbulent transition in a boundary layer – Part I. J. Aero. Sci. 18 (7), 490498.Google Scholar
Fransson, J. H. M. & Alfredsson, P. H. 2003 On the disturbance growth in an asymptotic suction boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 482, 5190.Google Scholar
Griffith, A. A. & Meredith, F. W.1936 The possible improvement in aircraft performance due to the use of boundary layer suction. Tech. Rep. 3501. Royal Aircraft Establishment.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. M., Kim, J. & Waleffe, F. 1995 Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures. J. Fluid Mech. 287, 317348.Google Scholar
Hocking, L. M. 1975 Non-linear instability of the asymptotic suction velocity profile. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 28 (3), 341353.Google Scholar
Itano, T. & Toh, S. 2001 The dynamics of bursting process in wall turbulence. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 70, 703716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1998 Experiments on boundary-layer receptivity to free-stream turbulence. AIAA Paper 980530.Google Scholar
Kerswell, R. R., Pringle, C. C. T. & Willis, A. P. 2014 An optimization approach for analysing nonlinear stability with transition to turbulence in fluids as an exemplar. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 085901.Google Scholar
Khapko, T., Duguet, Y., Kreilos, T., Schlatter, P., Eckhardt, B. & Henningson, D. S. 2014 Complexity of localised coherent structures in a boundary-layer flow. Eur. Phys. J. E 37 (4), 32.Google Scholar
Khapko, T., Kreilos, T., Schlatter, P., Duguet, Y., Eckhardt, B. & Henningson, D. S. 2013 Localised edge states in the asymptotic suction boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 717, R6.Google Scholar
Khapko, T., Schlatter, P., Duguet, Y. & Henningson, D. S. 2016 Turbulence collapse in a suction boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 795, 356379.Google Scholar
Kreilos, T., Khapko, T., Schlatter, P., Duguet, Y., Henningson, D. S. & Eckhardt, B. 2016 Bypass transition and spot nucleation in boundary layers. Phys. Rev. Fluids (to appear).Google Scholar
Kreilos, T., Veble, G., Schneider, T. M. & Eckhardt, B. 2013 Edge states for the turbulence transition in the asymptotic suction boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 726, 100122.Google Scholar
Matsubara, M. & Alfredsson, P. H. 2001 Disturbance growth in boundary layers subjected to free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 430, 149168.Google Scholar
Mellibovsky, F., Meseguer, A., Schneider, T. M. & Eckhardt, B. 2009 Transition in localized pipe flow turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 054502.Google Scholar
Saric, W. S., Reed, H. L. & Kerschen, E. J. 2002 Boundary-layer receptivity to freestream disturbances. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 291319.Google Scholar
Schlatter, P., Brandt, L., De Lange, H. C. & Henningson, D. S. 2008 On streak breakdown in bypass transition. Phys. Fluids 20, 101505.Google Scholar
Schneider, T. M., Eckhardt, B. & Yorke, J. A. 2007 Turbulence transition and the edge of chaos in pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 034502.Google Scholar
Schneider, T. M., Marinc, D. & Eckhardt, B. 2010 Localized edge states nucleate turbulence in extended plane Couette cells. J. Fluid Mech. 646, 441451.Google Scholar
Skufca, J. D., Yorke, J. A. & Eckhardt, B. 2006 Edge of chaos in a parallel shear flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 174101.Google Scholar
Willis, A. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2009 Turbulent dynamics of pipe flow captured in a reduced model: puff relaminarization and localized ‘edge’ states. J. Fluid Mech. 619, 213233.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, S., Fransson, J. H. M. & Alfredsson, P. H. 2004 Free stream turbulence induced disturbances in boundary layers with wall suction. Phys. Fluids 16 (10), 35303539.Google Scholar
Zaki, T. A. & Durbin, P. A. 2005 Mode interaction and the bypass route to transition. J. Fluid Mech. 531, 85111.Google Scholar
Zammert, S. & Eckhardt, B. 2014 Streamwise and doubly-localised periodic orbits in plane Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 761, 348359.Google Scholar

Khapko et al. supplementary movie

Three-dimensional animation of the edge state developing as a function of time; the edge state is reached after t=7000. The movie corresponds to an animated version of Figure 2, however with higher isolevels of both velocity fluctuations and λ2 (corresponding to the ones in Figure 5).

Download Khapko et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 3.9 MB

Khapko et al. supplementary movie

State-space view of noise-induced transition. The movie corresponds to an animated version of Figure 6.

Download Khapko et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 2.2 MB