Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:12:28.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Squirming through shear-thinning fluids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2015

Charu Datt
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
Lailai Zhu
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Fluid Mechanics and Instabilities, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland
Gwynn J. Elfring*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
On Shun Pak*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053, USA
*
Email addresses for correspondence: gelfring@mech.ubc.ca, opak@scu.edu
Email addresses for correspondence: gelfring@mech.ubc.ca, opak@scu.edu

Abstract

Many micro-organisms find themselves immersed in fluids displaying non-Newtonian rheological properties such as viscoelasticity and shear-thinning viscosity. The effects of viscoelasticity on swimming at low Reynolds numbers have already received considerable attention, but much less is known about swimming in shear-thinning fluids. A general understanding of the fundamental question of how shear-thinning rheology influences swimming still remains elusive. To probe this question further, we study a spherical squirmer in a shear-thinning fluid using a combination of asymptotic analysis and numerical simulations. Shear-thinning rheology is found to affect a squirming swimmer in non-trivial and surprising ways; we predict and show instances of both faster and slower swimming depending on the surface actuation of the squirmer. We also illustrate that while a drag and thrust decomposition can provide insights into swimming in Newtonian fluids, extending this intuition to problems in complex media can prove problematic.

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, R. B., Armstrong, R. C. & Hassager, O. 1987 Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids. Vol. 1: Fluid Mechanics. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Blake, J. R. 1971 A spherical envelope approach to ciliary propulsion. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 199208.Google Scholar
Bray, D. 2000 Cell Movements. Garland.Google Scholar
Brown, E. & Jaeger, H. M. 2011 Through thick and thin. Science 333, 12301231.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, M., Liu, B., Fu, H. C., Berhanu, M., Breuer, K. S., Powers, T. R. & Kudrolli, A. 2013 Speed of a swimming sheet in Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids. Phys. Rev. E 87, 013015.Google Scholar
Downton, M. T. & Stark, H. 2009 Simulation of a model microswimmer. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 204101.Google Scholar
Elfring, G. J. & Lauga, E. 2015 Theory of locomotion through complex fluids. In Complex Fluids in Biological Systems (ed. Spagnolie, S. E.), pp. 283317. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauci, L. J. & Dillon, R. 2006 Biofluidmechanics of reproduction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 371394.Google Scholar
Gagnon, D. A., Keim, N. C. & Arratia, P. E. 2014 Undulatory swimming in shear-thinning fluids: experiments with Caenorhabditis elegans . J. Fluid Mech. 758. doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.539.Google Scholar
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1983 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hwang, S. H., Litt, M. & Forsman, W. C. 1969 Rheological properties of mucus. Rheol. Acta 8, 438448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, T., Simmonds, M. P. & Pedley, T. J. 2006 Hydrodynamic interaction of two swimming model micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 568, 119160.Google Scholar
Lai, S. K., Wang, Y. Y., Wirtz, D. & Hanes, J. 2009 Micro- and macrorheology of mucus. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61, 86100.Google Scholar
Lauga, E. 2009 Life at high Deborah number. Europhys. Lett. 86, 64001.Google Scholar
Lauga, E. 2014 Locomotion in complex fluids: integral theorems. Phys. Fluids 26, 081902.Google Scholar
Lauga, E. 2015 The bearable gooeyness of swimming. J. Fluid Mech. 762, 14.Google Scholar
Lauga, E. & Powers, T. R. 2009 The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 096601.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On the squirming motion of nearly spherical deformable bodies through liquids at very small Reynolds numbers. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 5, 109118.Google Scholar
Mathijssen, A. J. T. M., Shendruk, T. N., Yeomans, J. M. & Doostmohammadi, A.2015 Upstream swimming in microbiological flows. Preprint arXiv:1507.00962.Google Scholar
Merrill, E. W. 1969 Rheology of blood. Physiol. Rev 49, 863888.Google Scholar
Montenegro-Johnson, T. D., Smith, A. A., Smith, D. J., Loghin, D. & Blake, J. R. 2012 Modelling the fluid mechanics of cilia and flagella in reproduction and development. Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 117.Google Scholar
Montenegro-Johnson, T. D., Smith, D. J. & Loghin, D. 2013 Physics of rheologically enhanced propulsion: different strokes in generalized Stokes. Phys. Fluids 25, 081903.Google Scholar
Qiu, T., Lee, T. C., Mark, A. G., Morozov, K. I., Münster, R., Mierka, O., Turek, S., Leshansky, A. M. & Fischer, P. 2014 Swimming by reciprocal motion at low Reynolds number. Nat. Commun. 5, 5119.Google Scholar
Stone, H. A. & Samuel, A. D. T. 1996 Propulsion of microorganisms by surface distortions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4102.Google Scholar
Sznitman, J. & Arratia, P. E. 2015 Locomotion through complex fluids: an experimental view. In Complex Fluids in Biological Systems (ed. Spagnolie, S. E.), pp. 245281. Springer.Google Scholar
Vélez-Cordero, J. R. & Lauga, E. 2013 Waving transport and propulsion in a generalized Newtonian fluid. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 199, 3750.Google Scholar
Yazdi, S., Ardekani, A. M. & Borhan, A. 2015 Swimming dynamics near a wall in a weakly elastic fluid. J. Nonlinear Sci. 25 (5), 11531167.Google Scholar
Zhu, L., Lauga, E. & Brandt, L. 2012 Self-propulsion in viscoelastic fluids: pushers vs. pullers. Phys. Fluids 24, 051902.Google Scholar