Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:15:50.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2014

Guler Duman ,
Gunseli Orhon  and
Nuray Gedik
Guler Duman
Affiliation:
Abant Izzet Baysal University, Department of Curriculum & Instruction, Bolu, 14280, Turkey (email: gulerduman@ymail.com)
Gunseli Orhon
Affiliation:
Akdeniz University, Department of Curriculum & Instruction, Antalya, 07058, Turkey (email: gnslorhon@gmail.com)
Nuray Gedik
Affiliation:
Akdeniz University, Department of Computer Education & Instructional Technology, Antalya, 07058, Turkey (email: ngedik@akdeniz.edu.tr)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to trace how mobile assisted language learning (MALL) has evolved in recent years, we analysed studies published from 2000 to 2012 to examine their characteristics and research trends. These studies were published in international journals listed in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Sixty-nine studies that fit the time frame and study parameters were examined using a classification form. The results indicate that research in the field increased at a fast pace from 2008 and reached a peak in 2012. Teaching vocabulary with the use of cell phones and PDAs has remained popular over this period. A significant number of studies did not base their research on any theoretical framework. Applied and design-based research dominated the field, and these studies generally adopted quantitative research methods. Reflecting on these results, we suggest directions for future research and practices in the field.

Keywords

mobile learningtechnology enhanced language learningMALLresearch trends
Type
Regular papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , May 2015 , pp. 197 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitchison, J. (1998) The articulate mammal: An introduction to psycholinguistics (4th ed.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Attewell, J. (2005) From research and development to mobile learning: Tools for education and training providers and their learners. Proceedings of 4th World Conference on mLearning, 1–6. Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
Begum, R. (2011) Prospect for cell phones as instructional tools in the EFL classroom: A case study of Jahangimagar University, Bangladesh. English Language Teaching (ELT), 4(1): 105–115.Google Scholar
Bozkaya, M., Aydın, I. E. and Kumtepe, E. G. (2012) Research trends and issues in educational technology: A content analysis of TOJET (2008–2011). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 11(2): 264–277.Google Scholar
Burston, J. (2013) Mobile-assisted language learning: A selected annotated bibliography of implementation studies 1994–2012. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3): 157–225.Google Scholar
Burston, J. (2014a) The reality of MALL project implementations: Still on the fringes. CALICO Journal, 31(1): 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burston, J. (2014b) Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Chen, C. M. and Chung, C. J. (2008) Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2): 624–645.Google Scholar
Chen, C.-M. and Li, Y.-L. (2010) Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(4): 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, W. S. and Hew, K. F. (2009) A review of research methodologies used in studies on mobile handheld devices in K-12 and higher education settings. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2): 153–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinnery, G. M. (2006) Emerging technologies: Going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1): 9–16.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2008) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003) Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1): 5–8.Google Scholar
Göktaş, Y., Küçük, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacık, Ö., Yıldırım, G. and Reisoğlu, İ. (2012) Educational technology research trends in Turkey: A content analysis of the 2000–2009 decade. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1): 191–196.Google Scholar
Hannafin, R. D. and Young, M. (2008) Research on educational technologies. In: Spector, M., Merrill, M. D., Merrienboer, J. V. and Driscoll, M. (eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. New York: Routledge, 731–739.Google Scholar
Harry, B., Sturges, K. M. and Klinger, J. K. (2005) Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2): 3–13.Google Scholar
Huberman, A. M. and Miles, M. B. (2002) The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hung, J. L. and Zhang, K. (2012) Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: A categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computer Higher Education, 24: 1–17.Google Scholar
Hwang, G. J. and Tsai, C. C. (2011) Research trend in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Education Technology, 42(4): E65–E70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. and Christensen, L. (2004) Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A. and Ludgate, H. (2013) NMC Horizon Report: 2013 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. B. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7): 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. E. and Lesh, R. A. (2000) Trends and shifts in research methods. In: Kelly, A. E. and Lesh, R. A. (eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 35–44.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005) Current uses of wireless and mobile learning – Landscape study on the use of mobile and wireless technologies for teaching and learning in the Post-16 sector. JISC-funded project. Retrieved May 24, 2013 from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Current%20Uses%20FINAL%202005.doc.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2006) Mobile usability in educational contexts: What have we learnt? Mlearn 2006 Conference, 20–26 October, Banff, Canada. 20(3): 271–289.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009) Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2): 157–165.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2013) Mobile-assisted language learning. In: C. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. New York: Wiley, 3701–3709.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A. and Shield, L. (2008) An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3): 271–289.Google Scholar
Lu, M. (2008) Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24(6): 515–525.Google Scholar
Masood, M. (2004) Trends and issues as reflected in traditional educational literature: A content analysis. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Indiana University, USA.Google Scholar
Miller, D. C. and Salkind, N. J. (eds.) (2002) Handbook of research design and social measurement (6th edn.). California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Oh, E. and Reeves, T. C. (2010) The implications of the differences between design research and instructional systems design for educational technology researchers and practitioners. Educational Media International, 47(4): 263–275.Google Scholar
Patton, M. (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Pęcherzewska, A. and Knot, S. (2007) Review of existing EU projects dedicated to dyslexia, gaming in education and m-learning. WR08 Report to CallDysc project. Retrieved November 24, 2011 from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/40115316/WR08---Existing-EU-Projects-review.Google Scholar
Reeves, T. C. (2000) Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through “design experiments” and other development research strategies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. http://treeves.coe.uga.edu/AERA2000Reeves.pdf.Google Scholar
Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J. and Oliver, R. (2005) Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2): 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, M., Mabogunje, Nash, J. and Licata, D. (2000) Mobile learning. Retrieved November 13, 2011 from http://sll.stanford.edu/projects/mobilelearning.Google Scholar
Ross, S. M. and Morrison, G. R. (2008) Research on instructional strategies. In: Spector, M., Merrill, M. D., Merrienboer, J. V. and Driscoll, M. (eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. New York: Routledge, 719–730.Google Scholar
Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R. and Lowther, D. L. (2005) Using experimental methods in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2): 39–64.Google Scholar
Saran, M., Seferoglu, G. and Cagiltay, K. (2009) Mobile assisted language learning: English pronunciation at learners’ fingertips. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34: 97–114.Google Scholar
Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M. and Vavoula, G. (2009) Mobile learning: small devices, big issues. In: Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., Jong, T., Lazonder, A. and Barnes, S. (eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Principles and products. Heidelberg: Springer, 233–249.Google Scholar
Sözbilir, M. and Kutu, H. (2008) Development and current status of science education research in Turkey. Essays in Education, [Special Issue], 1–22.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2007) Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4): 365–383.Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2010) Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2): 95–110.Google Scholar
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M. and Liu, X. (2006) Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1): 93–135.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. and Houser, C. (2005) Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3): 217–228.Google Scholar
Traxler, J. (2005) Mobile learning: It’s here, but what is it? Interactions, 9(1). Retrieved November 24, 2011 from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/resource/interactions/archive/issue25/traxler.Google Scholar
Traxler, J. (2007) Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ…. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2): 1–12.Google Scholar
Viberg, O. and Grönlund, Å. (2012) Mobile assisted language learning: A literature review. mLearn 2012. 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Wang, F. and Hannafin, M. J. (2005) Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4): 5–23.Google Scholar
Webster, J. and Watson, R. T. (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2): 13–23.Google Scholar
Wingkvist, A. and Ericsson, M. (2011) A survey of research methods and purposes in mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 3(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Woodill, G. (ed.) (2011) The mobile learning edge. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Wu, W.-H., Wu, Y.-C. J., Chen, C.-Y., Kao, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H. and Huang, S.-H. (2012) Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59: 817–827.Google Scholar
Ya, F. Y., Ching, J. C. and Chih, K. C. (2013) Mobile assisted language learning: Overview of literature from 2008 to 2012. The 21st International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2013), Denpasar Bali, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Zawacki-Richter, O., Bäcker, E. M. and Vogt, S. (2009) Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6): 21–45.Google Scholar