Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T14:04:34.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Isotopic signatures and hereditary traits: snapshot of a Neolithic community in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

R. Alexander Bentley
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Durham University, 43 Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HN, UK (Email: r.a.bentley@durham.ac.uk)
Joachim Wahl
Affiliation:
RP Stuttgart, Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, Osteologie, Stromeyersdorfstraße 3, D-78467, Konstanz, Germany (Email: Joachim.Wahl@rps.bwl.de)
T. Douglas Price
Affiliation:
Department. of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, 1180 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706-1393, USA (Email: tdprice@wisc.edu)
Tim C. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK (Email: t.atkinson@ucl.ac.uk)

Extract

A group of Linearbandkeramik people at Talheim, Germany were previously found to have died at the same time, probably in a massacre, and the authors were able to ask some searching questions of their skeletons. The isotope signatures of strontium, oxygen and carbon, which gave information on diet and childhood region, showed up three groups which correlated with hereditary traits (derived previously from the analysis of the teeth). In the local group, there were many local children but no adult women, suggesting they had been selectively taken alive at the time of the massacre. Another group, with isotope signatures derived from upland areas, includes two men who may have been closely related. A third group has a composition suggestive of a nuclear family. The variations of one type of isotope signature with another suggested subtle interpretations, such as transhumance, and a probable labour division in the community between stockholders and cultivators. Here we see the ever-growing potential of these new methods for writing the ‘biographies’ of prehistoric skeletons.

Type
Research article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, K.W., Vach, W. & Wahl, J.. 1995. Verwandtschaftsanalyse der Skelettreste aus dem bandkeramischen Massengrab von Talheim, Kreis Heilbronn. Fundberichte aus Baden-W¨urttemberg 20: 195217.Google Scholar
Alt, K.W., 1997. La reconstitution “génétique” de la population de la fosse rubanée de Talheim, Alllemagne. Cahiers de l'Association pour la Promotion de la Recherche Archéologique en Alsace 3:18.Google Scholar
Ambrose, S.H. & Norr, L.. 1993. Experimental evidence for the relationship of the carbon isotope ratios of whole diet and dietary protein to those of bone collagen and carbonate, in Lambert, J. B. & Grupe, G. (ed.) Prehistoric Human Bone: Archaeology at the Molecular Level: 137. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Balasse, M., Ambrose, S. H., Smith, A. B. & Price, T. D.. 2002. The seasonal mobility model for prehistoric herders in the south-western cape of South Africa assessed by isotopic analysis of sheep tooth enamel. Journal of Archaeological Science 29: 917–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. A. 2006. Strontium isotopes from the Earth to the archaeological skeleton: a review. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 13: 135–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. A. & Knipper, C.. 2005a. Geographical patterns in biologically available strontium, carbon and oxygen isotope signatures in prehistoric SW Germany. Archaeometry 47: 629–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. A. 2005b. Transhumance at the early Neolithic settlement at Vaihingen (Germany). Antiquity: http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/bentley/index.html.Google Scholar
Bentley, R. A., Price, T. D., L¨uning, J., Gronenborn, D., Wahl, J. & Fullagar, P. D.. 2002. Human migration in early Neolithic Europe. Current Anthropology 43: 799804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. A., Krause, R., Price, T. D. & Kaufmann, B.. 2003. Human mobility at the early Neolithic settlement of Vaihingen, Germany. Archaeometry 45: 471–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. A., Price, T. D. & Stephan, E.. 2004. Determining the ‘local’ 87Sr/86Sr range for archaeological skeletons. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 365–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogucki, P. 1988. Forest Farmers and Stockherders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowen, G. J. & Wilkinson, B.. 2002. Spatial distribution of δ18 O in meteoric precipitation. Geology 30: 315–8.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, P., Millard, A., Chenery, C., Lucy, S. & Roberts, C.. 2004. Investigating population movement by stable isotope analysis: a report from Britain. Antiquity 78: 127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Angela, D. & Longinelli, A.. 1990. Oxygen isotopes in living mammals' bone phosphate: further results. Chemical Geology 86: 7582.Google Scholar
DeNiro, M. J. & Epstein, S.. 1978. Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 42: 495506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D¨rrwächter, C., Craig, O. E., Collins, M. J., Burger, J. & Alt, K. W.. 2006. Beyond the grave: variability in Neolithic diets in Southern Germany? Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmunds, W. M. & Tyler, S. W.. 2002. Unsaturated zones as archives of past climates: toward a new proxy for continental regions. Hydrogeology Journal 10: 216–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhauer, U. 2003. J¨ungerbandkeramische Residenzregeln: Patrilokalitäat in Talheim, in Eckert, J., Eisenhauer, U. & Zimmermann, A. (ed.) Archäologische Perspektiven: Analysen und Interpretationen im Wandel; Festschrift f¨ur Jens L¨uning zum 65. Geburtstag: 561–73. Rahden: Leidorf.Google Scholar
Fox, R. 1983. Kinship and Marriage: an Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heaton, T.E.H.. 1999. Spatial, species, and temporal variations in the 13C/12C ratios of C3 plants: implications for paleodiet studies. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:637–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, C. & Mace, R.. 2003. Spread of cattle led to the loss of matrilineal descent in Africa, a coevolutionary analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270:2425–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holden, C. J., Sear, R. & Mace, R.. 2003. Matriliny as daughter-biased investment. Evolution and Human Behavior 24:99112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kienlin, T. L. & Valde-Nowak, P.. 2003. Neolithic transhumance in the Black Forest Mountains, SW Germany. Journal of Field Archaeology 29:2944.Google Scholar
Koch, P. L., Tuross, N. & Fogel, M. L.. 1997. The effects of sample treatment and diagenesis on the isotopic integrity of carbonate in biogenic hydroxylapatite. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:417–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, M. J. 1996. A predictive model for animalδ18 O: accounting for diet and physiological adaptation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 60:4811–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
K¨orner, C., Farquhar, G. D. & Wong, S. C.. 1991. Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends. Oecologia 74: 623–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, R. (ed.) 2000. Die bandkeramischen Siedlungsgrabungen bei Vaihingen an der Enz, Kreis Ludwigsburg, Baden-W¨urttemberg. Ein Vorbericht zu den Ausgrabungen von 1994-1997. Berichte der Röomisch-Germanischen Kommission 79: 5105.Google Scholar
Mayer, B. & Schwark, L.. 1999. A 15,000-year stable isotope record from the sediments of Lake Steisslingen, Southwest Germany. Chemical Geology 161:315–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, J., Evans, J. A. & Cooper, R. E.. 2007. Resolving archaeological populations with Sr-isotope mixing diagrams. Applied Geochemistry 22:1502–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. L. & Koch, P. L.. 2002. Incorporating concentration dependence in stable isotope mixing models. Oecologia 130: 114–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, T. D., Grupe, G. & Schr¨oter, P.. 1998. Migration in the Bell Beaker period of central Europe. Antiquity 72:405–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T. D., Bentley, R. A., L¨uning, J., Gronenborn, D. & Wahl, J.. 2001. Prehistoric human migration in the Linearbandkeramik of Central Europe. Antiquity 75:593603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T. D., Burton, J. H. & Bentley, R. A.. 2002. Characterization of biologically available strontium isotope ratios for the study of prehistoric migration. Archaeometry 44:117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T. D., Wahl, J., Knipper, C., Burger-Heinrich, E., Kurz, G. & Bentley, R. A.. 2003. Das bandkeramische Gräaberfeld vom ‘Viesenhäuser Hof‘ bei Stuttgart M¨uhlhausen: Neue Untersuchungsergebnisse zum Migrationsverhalten im fr¨uhen Neolithikum. Fundberichte aus Baden-W¨urttemberg 27:2358. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Price, T. D., Wahl, J. & Bentley, R. A.. 2008. Isotopic evidence for mobility and group organization among Neolithic farmers at Talheim, Germany, 5000 B.C. EuropeanJournal of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Seielstad, M. T., Minch, E. & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L.. 1998. Genetic evidence for a higher female migration rate in humans. Nature Genetics 20:278–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
T¨utken, T., Vennemann, T. W. & Pfretschner, H.-U.. 2004. Analyse stabiler und radiogener Isotope in archäologischem Skelettmaterial: Herkunftsbestimmung des karolingischen Maultiers von Frankental und Vergleich mit spätpleistozänen Großsaugerknochen aus den Rheinablagerungen. Pr¨ahistorische Zeitschrift 79:89110.Google Scholar
Wahl, J. 1985. Ein neolithisches Massengrab bei Talheim, Landkreis Heilbronn. Arch¨aologische Ausgrabungen in Baden-W¨urttemberg 1984: 3032.Google Scholar
Wahl, J. & K¨onig, H. G.. 1987. Anthropologischtraumatologische Untersuchung der menschlichen Skelettreste aus dem bandkeramischen Massengrab bei Talheim, Kreis Heilbronn. Fundberichte aus Baden W¨urttemberg 12:65193.Google Scholar
Wild, E. M., Stadler, P., Hausser, A., Kutschera, W., Steier, P., Teschler-Nicola, M., Wahl, J. & Windl, H. J.. 2004. Neolithic massacres: Local skirmishes or general warfare in Europe? Radiocarbon 46:377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar