Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:01:16.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon: where we are and where we need to be

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

B.S. Ottaway
B.S. Ottaway*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Preceding papers in this section have underlined how much more there is to effective use of radiocarbon dating than the taking of some samples, their running in a laboratory, and the calibration of the individual dates that result. Here is a summary of where we are and where we may, with calibration, be going.

Type
Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 61 , Issue 231 , March 1987 , pp. 135 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baille, M.G.L. 1985. Irish dendrochronology and radiocarbon calibration, Ulster Journal of Archaeology 48: 11–24.Google Scholar
Baillie, M.G.L. & Pilcher, J.R.. 1983. Some observations on the high-precision calibration of routine dates, in Ottaway, B.S. (ed.), Archaeology, dendrochronology and the high precision calibration curve: 51–63. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Department of Archaeology. Occasional papers 19.Google Scholar
Mook, W.G. 1986. Resolutions adopted by the 12th International Radiocarhon Conference, Trondheim, Radiocarbon 28 (2A): 799.Google Scholar
Otlet, B. 1985. Demonstration at 12th International Radiocarbon Conference, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Ottaway, B.S. 1973. Dispersion diagrams: a new approach to the display of 14C dates, Archaeometry 15 (1): 5–12.Google Scholar
Ottaway, B.S. 1986. Is radiocarbon dating obsolescent for archaeologists?, Radiocarbon 28 (2A): 732–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, G.W., Pilcher, J.R., Baillie, M.G.L., Corbett, D.M. & Qua, F.. 1986. High precision 14C measurements of Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from AD 1840–5210 BC, in Stuiver, & Kra, 1986: 911–34.Google Scholar
Pearson, G.W. & Stuiver, M.. 1986. High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale 500–2500 BC, in Stuiver, & Kra, 1986: 839–62.Google Scholar
Robinson, S.W. 1985. Demonstration at 12th International Radiocarbon Conference, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Scott, E.M., Baxter, M.S., Aitchison, T.C., Harkness, D.D. & Cook, G.T.. 1986. Announcement of a new collaborative study for intercalibration of l4C dating laboratories, Radiocarbon 28 (1): 167–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, E.M., Baxter, M.S. & Aitchison, T.C.. In press. The calibration process in radiocarbon dating: a review, Archaeology Review.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Kra, R.S. (ed.). 1986. Radiocarbon calibration issue: proceedings of the Twelfth International Radiocarbon Conference, June 24–28 1985, Trondheim, Norway. Radiocarbon 28 (2B).Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Pearson, G.W.. 1986. High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950–500 BC, in Stuiver, & Kra, 1986: 805–38.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P.J.. 1986. A computer program for radiocarbon age calibrations, in Stuiver, & Kra, 1986: 1022–30.Google Scholar
Ward, G.K. & Wilson, S.R.. 1978. Procedure for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: a critique, Archaeometry 20: 19–31.Google Scholar
Ward, G.K. & Wilson, S.R.. 1981. Evaluation and clustering of radiocarbon age determination: procedures and paradigms, Archaeometry 23: 19–39.Google Scholar
Weninger, B. In press. High-precision calibration of archaeological radiocarbon dates, Proceedings of Symposium on dating methods in archaeology, Nove Vozokany, 1985.Google Scholar