Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:45:56.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-rays from Core-collapse Supernovae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2014

David Pooley
David Pooley*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas 77341 and Eureka Scientific, Inc. email: dave@shsu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Core-collapse supernovae can produce X-rays through a variety of mechanisms, which are briefly reviewed. Through a combination of targeted searches of specific supernovae and archival searches for serendipitous coverage of supernovae, the number of known X-ray supernovae has grown by a factor of five in the past 13 years, when the Chandra X-ray Observatory and XMM-Newton were launched. The Swift satellite has contributed greatly to the discovery of X-ray emitted supernovae, but care must taken with all Swift detections given its spatial resolution and the number of X-ray binaries typically seen in external galaxies. About half of the reported Swift detections of X-ray emission from supernovae are in fact not due to the supernovae but from unrelated nearby sources in the host galaxies.

Keywords

supernovae: generalstars: mass loss
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S296: Supernova Environmental Impacts , January 2013 , pp. 103 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Arnaud, K. A. 1996, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 101, 17Google Scholar
Canizares, C. R., Kriss, G. A., & Feigelson, E. D. 1982, ApJ, 253, L17Google Scholar
Chevalier, R. A. 1982a, ApJ, 258, 790Google Scholar
Chevalier, R. A. 1982b, ApJ, 259, 302Google Scholar
Chevalier, R. A. & Fransson, C. 1994, ApJ, 420, 268Google Scholar
Chevalier, R. A., Fransson, C., & Nymark, T. K. 2006, ApJ, 641, 1029Google Scholar
Chevalier, R. A. & Fransson, C. 2006, ApJ, 651, 381Google Scholar
Chugai, N. N. 1993, ApJ, 414, L101Google Scholar
Couch, S. M., Pooley, D., Wheeler, J. C., & Milosavljević, M. 2011, ApJ, 727, 104Google Scholar
Dwarkadas, V. V. & Gruszko, J. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransson, C., Lundqvist, P., & Chevalier, R. A. 1996, ApJ, 461, 993Google Scholar
Freeman, P., Doe, S., & Siemiginowska, A. 2001, Proc. SPIE, 4477, 76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modjaz, M., Li, W., Butler, N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 226Google Scholar
Nymark, T. K., Fransson, C., & Kozma, C. 2006, A&A, 449, 171Google Scholar
Pooley, D. 2007, Supernova 1987A: 20 Years After, 937, 381Google Scholar
Sell, P. H., Pooley, D., Zezas, A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 26Google Scholar
Soderberg, A. M., Berger, E., Page, K. L., et al. 2008, Nature, 453, 469Google Scholar
Suzuki, T. & Nomoto, K. 1995, ApJ, 455, 658Google Scholar