Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:09:09.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dust Emission in Early-Type Galaxies with the Herschel Virgo Cluster Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2013

Sperello di Serego Alighieri
Affiliation:
INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy email: sperello@arcetri.astro.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have searched for dust in an optical sample of 910 Early-Type Galaxies (ETGs) in the Virgo cluster (447 of which are optically complete at mpg ≤ 18.0), extending also to the dwarf ETGs, using Herschel images at 100, 160, 250, 350 and 500 μm. Dust was found in 52 ETGs (46 are in the optically complete sample), including M87 and another 3 ETGs with strong synchrotron emisssion. Dust is detected in 17% of ellipticals, 41% of lenticulars, and in about 4% of dwarf ETGs. The dust-to-stars mass ratio increases with decreasing optical luminosity, and for some dwarf ETGs reaches values similar to those of the dusty late-type galaxies. Slowly rotating ETGs are more likely to contain dust than fast rotating ones. Only 8 ETGs have both dust and HI, while 39 have only dust and 8 have only HI, surprisingly showing that only rarely dust and HI survive together. ETGs with dust appear to be concentrated in the densest regions of the cluster, while those with HI tend to be at the periphery. ETGs with an X-ray active SMBH are more likely to have dust and vice versa the dusty ETGs are more likely to have an active SMBH.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., & Tammann, G. A., 1985, AJ 90 1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbelli, E., Bianchi, S., Cortese, L., et al., 2012, A&A 542 A32Google Scholar
Davies, J. I., Baes, M., Bendo, G. J., et al., 2010, A&A 518 L48Google Scholar
di Serego Alighieri, S., Gavazzi, G., Giovanardi, C., et al., 2007, A&A 474 851Google Scholar
Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., Bendo, G., et al., 2007, ApJ 663 866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emsellem, E., Cappellari, M., Krajnović, D., et al., 2011, MNRAS 414 888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, E., Treu, T., Marshall, P. J., et al., 2010, ApJ 714 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., Scodeggio, M., Pierini, D., & Belsole, E., 1999, MNRAS 304 595Google Scholar
Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., Donati, A., Franzetti, P., & Scodeggio, M., 2003, A&A 400 451Google Scholar
Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M. P., Kent, B. R., et al., 2007, AJ 133 2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, H. L., Baes, M., Cortese, L., et al., 2010, A&A 518 L45Google Scholar
Haynes, M. P., Giovanelli, R., Martin, A. M., et al., 2011, AJ 142 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, G. R., Guhathakurta, P., Kim, D.-W., & Jura, M., 1989, ApJSS 70 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilbratt, G. L., Riedinger, J. R., Passvogel, T., et al., 2010, A&A 518 L1Google Scholar
Smith, D. J. B., Dunne, L., Maddox, S. J., et al., 2011, MNRAS 416 857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. W. L., Gomez, H. L., Eales, S. A., et al., 2012, ApJ 748 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temi, P., Brighenti, F., Mathews, W. G., & Bregman, J. D., 2004, ApJSS 151 237Google Scholar
Young, L. M., Bureau, M., Davis, T. A., et al., 2011, MNRAS 414 940Google Scholar
Zibetti, S., Charlot, S., & Rix, H.-W., 2009, MNRAS 400 181Google Scholar