Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T11:23:33.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distance estimates in the Milky Way using tidal streams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Daniele S. M. Fantin*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones de Astronomía, Apdo. Postal 264, Mérida 5101-A, Venezuela email: daniele.fanta21@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the past 20 years, numerous stellar streams have been discovered in both the Milky Way and the Local Group. These streams have been tidally torn from orbiting systems, which suggests that most should roughly trace the orbit of their progenitors around the Galaxy. As a consequence, they play a fundamental role in understanding the formation and evolution of our Galaxy. This project is based on the possibility of applying a technique developed by Binney to various tidal streams and overdensities in the Galaxy. The aim is to develop an efficient method to constrain the Galactic gravitational potential, to determine its mass distribution, and to test distance measurements. Here we apply the technique to the Grillmair & Dionatos GD-1 cold stellar stream. In the unrealistic case of noise-free data, the results show that the technique provides excellent discrimination against incorrect potentials and that it is possible to predict the heliocentric distance very accurately. This changes dramatically when errors are taken into account, which wash out most of the results. Nevertheless, it is still possible to rule out spherical potentials and set constraints on the distance of a given stream.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Binney, J. 2008, MNRAS, 386, L47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fellhauer, M., Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 651, 167Google Scholar
Grillmair, C. J. 2010, in: Galaxies and their Masks, p. 247Google Scholar
Grillmair, C. J. & Dionatos, O. 2006, ApJ, 643, L17Google Scholar
Grillmair, C. J. 2006, ApJ, 645, L37Google Scholar
Helmi, A. 2004, ApJ, 610, L97Google Scholar
Ibata, R., Irwin, M., Lewis, G., Ferguson, A. M. N., & Tanvir, N. 2001, Nature, 412, 49Google Scholar
Koposov, S. E., Rix, H. W., & Hogg, D. W. 2010, ApJ, 712, 260Google Scholar
Miyamoto, M. & Nagai, R. 1975, PASJ, 27, 533Google Scholar
Willett, B. A., Newberg, H. J., Zhang, H., Yanny, B., & Beers, T. C. 2009, ApJ, 697, 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar