Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:55:07.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-mass X-ray binaries in a cosmological context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2013

María Celeste Artale*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, CONICET-UBA, CC 67 Suc 28, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina
Leonardo J. Pellizza
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, CONICET-UBA, CC 67 Suc 28, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina
Patricia B. Tissera
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, CONICET-UBA, CC 67 Suc 28, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina
I. Felix Mirabel
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, CONICET-UBA, CC 67 Suc 28, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina CEA-Saclay, IRFU/DSM/Service d'Astrophysique, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent observational and theoretical results suggest that the production rates and luminosities of high-mass X-ray binaries depend on metallicity. To test this prediction, we combine HMXB population synthesis results with numerical simulations of galaxy formation to produce synthetic populations of HMXBs in star-forming galaxies, and compare the model predictions to observations of HMXB populations in nearby and high-redshift galaxies. Our models show a fair agreement with observations only when the HMXB production and luminosities are assumed to depend strongly on metallicity.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Belczynski, K., Sadowski, A., & Rasio, F. A. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, L. L., Barger, A. J., & Hasinger, G. 2012, ApJ, 748, 50Google Scholar
De Rossi, M. E. & Tissera, P. B. 2010, A&A, 519, 89Google Scholar
Fabbiano, G. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 323Google Scholar
Fragos, T., Lehmer, B., Tremmel, M., et al. 2012, arXiv:1206.2395Google Scholar
Georgy, C., Meynet, G., Walder, R., Folini, D., & Maeder, A. 2009, A&A, 502, 611Google Scholar
Kaaret, P., Schmitt, J., & Gorski, M. 2011, ApJ, 741, 10Google Scholar
Linden, T., Kalogera, V., Sepinsky, J. F., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 1984Google Scholar
Mirabel, I. F., Dijkstra, M., Laurent, P., Loeb, A., & Pritchard, J. R. 2011, A&A, 528, 149Google Scholar
Mineo, S., Gilfanov, M., & Sunyaev, R. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2095Google Scholar
Scannapieco, C., Tissera, P. B., White, S. D. M., & Springel, V. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1125Google Scholar