Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:25:44.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved Time-Series Photometry and Calibration Method for Non-Crowded Fields: MMT Megacam and HAT-South Experiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Seo-Won Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea email: seowony@galaxy.yonsei.ac.kr
Yong-Ik Byun
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea email: seowony@galaxy.yonsei.ac.kr
Dae-Won Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea email: seowony@galaxy.yonsei.ac.kr Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138. USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a new photometric reduction method for precise time-series photometry of non-crowded fields that does not need to involve relatively complicated and CPU intensive techniques such as point-spread-function (PSF) fitting or difference image analysis. This method, which combines multi-aperture index photometry and a spatio-temporal de-trending algorithm, gives much superior performance in data recovery and light-curve precision. In practice, the brutal filtering that is often applied to remove outlying data points can result in the loss of vital data, with seriously negative impacts on short-term variations such as flares. Our method utilizes nearly 100% of available data and reduces the rms scatter to several times smaller than that for archived light curves for brighter stars. We outline the details of our new method, and apply it to cases of sample data from the MMT survey of the M37 field, and the HAT-South survey.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Bakos, G., et al. , 2009, in: Pont, F., Saeelov, D., & Holman, M. (eds.), Transiting Planets, IAU Symposium No. 253 (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), p. 354Google Scholar
Hartman, J. D., et al. , 2008, ApJ, 675, 1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. B. & Everett, M. E. 2001, in: Borucki, W.J. & Lasher, L.E. (eds.), 3rd Workshop on Photometry, p. 1Google Scholar
Kim, D.-W., Protopapas, P., Alcock, C., Byun, Y.-I., & Bianco, F. B. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovács, G., Bakos, G., & Noyes, R. W. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamuz, O., Mazeh, T., & Zucker, S. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar