Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:18:21.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Sensitivity of Period Searches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

A. Schwarzenberg-Czerny*
Affiliation:
Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Centre, 00-716 Warsaw Adam Mickiewicz University Observatory, PL 60-286, Poznań, Poland email: alex@camk.edu.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Astronomical time series are special in that time sampling in them is uneven yet often with periodic gaps due to daytime, moon and seasons. There is therefore a need for special-purpose time-series analysis (TSA) methods. The emergence of massive CCD photometric surveys from the ground and space raises the question of an automatic period search in ≫ 105 light curves. We caution that already at the planning stage it is important to account for the effects of time sampling and analysis methods on the sensitivity of detections. We present a transparent scheme for the classification of period-search methods. We employ tools for evaluating the performance of those methods, according to the type of light curves investigated. In particular we consider sinusoidal and non-sinusoidal oscillations as well as eclipse or transit light curves. From these considerations we draw recommendations for the optimum analysis of astronomical time series. We present briefly the capability of an automatic period-search package Tatry. Finally we discuss the role of Monte Carlo simulations in the analysis of detection sensitivity. As an example, we demonstrate a practical method to account for the bandwidth (multi-trial) penalty in the statistical evaluation of detected periods.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Akerlof, C., Alcock, C., Allsman, R., et al. , 1994, AJ, 436, 787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeming, T. J. 1975, Astrophys. Sp. Sc., 36, 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieronimus, Ya.L., 1958, Orthogonal polynomials of circle and real intervals, Moscow, GIFML (in Russian)Google Scholar
Horne, J. H. & Baliunas, S. L. 1986, ApJ, 302, 757Google Scholar
Lomb, N. R. 1976, Atrophys. Sp. Sc., 39, 447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paltani, S. 2004, A&A, 420, 789Google Scholar
Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 1989, MNRAS, 241, 153Google Scholar
Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 1991, MNRAS, 253, 198Google Scholar
Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 1996, ApJ, 460, L107Google Scholar
Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 1997, ApJ, 489, 941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 1998, Baltic Astronomy, 7, 43Google Scholar
Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 1999, ApJ, 516, 315Google Scholar
Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. & Beaulieu, J.-P., 2006, MNRAS, 365, 165Google Scholar
Stellingwerf, R. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 953CrossRefGoogle Scholar