Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T20:29:13.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantifying the Redistribution of Mass in Galactic Disks due to Bars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Patricia Sánchez-Blázquez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Física Teórica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco 28049, Spain email: p.sanchezblazquez@uam.es
Isabel Pérez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Física Teórica, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Spain
Pierre Ocvirk
Affiliation:
Observatoire astronomique, 6700, Strasbourgh, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Numerical simulations have shown that strong gravitational torque by non-axisymmetric components induce evolutionary processes such as redistribution of mass and angular momentum in the galactic disks and consequent change of chemical abundance profiles. If we hope to understand chemical evolution gradients and their evolution we must understand the secular processes and re-arrangement of material by non-axisymmetric components and vice-versa. The most obvious of these aforementioned non-axisymmetric components are bars - at least 2/3 of spiral galaxies host a bar, and possibly all disk galaxies have hosted a bar at some point in their evolution. While observationally it has been found that barred galaxies have shallower gas-phase metallicity gradients than non-barred galaxies, a complementary analysis of the stellar abundance profiles has not yet been undertaken. This is unfortunate because the study of both gas and stars is important in providing a complete picture, as the two components undergo (and suffer from) very different evolutionary process. We present here a pilot study of the gas and stellar metallicity and age distributions in a sample of barred and non-barred galaxies using 2D spectroscopic observations. We found that the majority of the stellar mass in our sample is composed of old (~10 Gyr) stars. This is true in the bulge and the disc region, even beyond two disc scalelengths. In the disc region, a larger fraction of young stars is present in the external parts of the disc compared with the inner disc. The disc growth is, therefore, compatible with a moderate inside-out formation scenario, where the luminosity-weighted age changes from ~10 Gyrs in the centre, to ~4 Gyrs at two disc scalelengths, depending upon the galaxy. However, the presence of substructure, like star forming rings, can produce stellar population trends that are not directly related with the growing of the disc but to the bar potential. In the disc region, the metallicity gradient always decrease with the radius. In the bulge region this is not always true and we find inverse metallicity gradients in several galaxies.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Berentzen, I., Shlosman, I., Martínez-Valpuesta, I., Heller, C. H., 2007, ApJ, 666, 189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bournaud, F., Combes, F., & Semelin, B., 2005, MNRAS, 364, 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresci, G., Mannucci, F., Maiolino, R., Marconi, A., Gnerucci, A., & Magrini, L., 2010, Nature, 30, 490Google Scholar
Debattista, V. P., Mayer, L., Carollo, C. M., Moore, B., Wadsley, J., & Quinn, T., 2006, ApJ, 645, 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedli, D., Benz, W., & Kennicutt, R., 1994, ApJ, 430, 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadotti, D., 2008, in Chaos in Astronomy, Ed. Contopulos, G. & Patsis, P.A..Google Scholar
Ocvirk, P., Pichon, C., Lançon, A., & Thébaut, E., 2006, MNRAS, 365, 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocvirk, P., Pichon, C., Lançon, A., & Thiébaut, E., 2006, MNRAS, 365, 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, I., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., & Zurita, A., 2009, A&A, 495, 775Google Scholar
Pfenniger, D. & Friedli, D., 1991, A&A, 252, 75Google Scholar
Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Kennicutt, R. C., Sánchez, S. F., Díaz, A. I., Pasquali, A., Johnson, B. D., & Hao, C. N., 2010, MNRAS, 405, 735Google Scholar
Roškar, R., Debattista, V. P., Quinn, T. R., Stinson, G. S., & Wadsley, J., 2008, ApJ, 648, 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Courty, S., Gibson, B. K., & Brook, C. B., 2009, MNRAS, 398, 591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, J. & Sellwood, J. A., 2004, ApJ, 604, 614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazdekis, A., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Falcón-Barroso, J., Cenarro, A. J., Beasley, M. A., Cardiel, N., Gorgas, J., & Peletier, R. F., 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1639Google Scholar
Vila-Costas, M. B. & Edmunds, M. G., 1992, MNRAS, 259, 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaritsky, D., Kennicutt, R. C. Jr; & Huchra, J. P., 1994, ApJ, 420, 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar