Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:22:13.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supergranulation and its Activity Dependence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2011

U. Paniveni ,
V. Krishan ,
J. Singh  and
R. Srikanth
U. Paniveni
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore-560034, India NIE Institute of technology, Hootagalli Industrial Area, Mysore-570018, India
V. Krishan
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore-560034, India Raman Research Institute, Sadashiva nagar Bangalore-560080, Karnataka, India
J. Singh
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore-560034, India
R. Srikanth
Affiliation:
Raman Research Institute, Sadashiva nagar Bangalore-560080, Karnataka, India Poornaprajna Institute of Scientific Research, Devanahalli, Bangalore-562 110, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study the complexity of supergranular cells using the intensity patterns obtained at the Kodaikanal solar observatory during the solar maximum. Our data consists of visually identified supergranular cells, from which a fractal dimension D is obtained according to the relation P ∝ AD/2 where A is the area and P is the perimeter of the cells. We find a difference in the fractal dimension between the active and the quiet region cells which is conjectured to be due to the magnetic activity level.

Keywords

Sun: granulation — turbulence
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S271: Astrophysical Dynamics: From Stars to Galaxies , June 2010 , pp. 391 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Batchelor, G. K., The theory of Homogeneous Turbulence (Cambridge University Press 1953).Google Scholar
Kosovichev, A. G. in Dynamic Sun, chapter 5; ed. Dwivedi, B. N. (CUP, 2007)Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. K., Ruzmaikin, A. A., Cadavid, A. C.Astrophysical Journal 417, 805 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, B., 1975, J. Fluid Mech., 72, part 2, 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. 1977, Fractals (San Francisco: Freeman).Google Scholar
Noyes, R. W., The Sun, Our star (Harvard University press 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paniveni, U., Krishan, V., Singh, J., & Srikanth, R., 2005, Solar Physics, 231, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roudier, Th. & Muller, R., 1986, Solar Physics, 107, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenflo, J.O. and Holzreuter, R. in Current Theoretical Models and Future High Resolution Solar Observations: Preparing for ATST, ed. Pevtsov, A.A. & Uitenbroek, H., ASP Conf.Ser., 286, 169 (2003).Google Scholar