Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:31:46.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards observational MHD. Advances in spectropolarimetry and the prospects for the E-ELT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2011

Klaus G. Strassmeier
Klaus G. Strassmeier*
Affiliation:
Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany email: kstrassmeier@aip.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Polarization and wavelength are the bits of information attached to every photon that reveal the most about its formation and subsequent history. The E-ELT will, for the foreseeable future, be the most powerful optical light-collecting machine ever built. The strength of its combination, spectropolarimetry with the E-ELT, is the anchorage in physics of astronomical observations. I present a strawman design of a spectropolarimeter for its intermediate focus.

Keywords

Magnetic fields – stars: magnetic fields – instrumentation: polarimeters – techniques: polarimetric – techniques: spectroscopic
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S274: Advances in Plasma Astrophysics , September 2010 , pp. 274 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Arnold, L., Gillet, S., Lardiere, O., Riaud, P., & Schneider, J. 2002, A&A 392, 231Google Scholar
Baade, D., Wang, L., Hubrig, S., & Patat, F. 2006, in IAU Symp. 232, CUP, p.248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, R. 2010, in “Astronomy with Megastructures. Joint Science with E-ELT and SKA”, arXiv:1008.3806Google Scholar
Boehnhardt, H., Tozzi, G. P., Sterzik, M. et al. . 2009, Earth, Moon & Planets, 105, 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, T. A., Strassmeier, K. G., Ilyin, I., & Rice, J. B. 2011, in IAU Symp. 273, CUP, in pressGoogle Scholar
Clemens, D. P., Pinnick, A., Pavel, M. et al. . 2009, BAAS 41, 459Google Scholar
Donati, J.-F. et al. . 2008, MNRAS 386, 1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigelson, E. & Montmerle, T. 1999, ARA&A 37, 363Google Scholar
Feinstein, C., Vergne, M. M., Martinez, R., & Orsatti, A. M. 2008, MNRAS 391, 447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaenslera, B. M., Beck, R., & Feretti, L. 2004, New Astron. Reviews 48, 1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdani, S., Arnold, L., Foellmi, C. et al. . 2006, A&A 460, 617Google Scholar
Hubrig, S., Grady, C., Schöller, M. et al. . 2009, in IAU Symp. 259, CUP, p.395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns-Krull, C., Greene, T. P., Doppmann, G. W., & Covey, K. R. 2009, ApJ 700, 1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandori, R., Kusakabe, N., Tamura, M. et al. . 2006, SPIE 6269, 159Google Scholar
Laux, U., Klose, S., & Greiner, J. 2009, poster at the fall meeting of the AG 2009, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
McKee, C. F. & Ostriker, E. C. 2007, ARA&A 45, 565Google Scholar
Pizzarello, S. et al. . 2008, PNAS 105, 3010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanó, P., Zerbi, F. M., Norrie, C. J. et al. . 2006, AN 327, 649Google Scholar
Stam, D. M. 2008, A&A 482, 989Google Scholar
Sterzik, M. F. & Bagnulo, S. 2009, in Bioastronomy 2007, ASPC 420, p.371Google Scholar
Strassmeier, K. G., Rice, J. B., Ritter, A. et al. . 2005, A&A 440, 1105Google Scholar
Strassmeier, K. G., Woche, M., Ilyin, I. et al. . 2008, SPIE 7014, 21Google Scholar
Wang, L., Baade, D., Höflich, P. et al. . 2006, ApJ 653, 490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, H. & Lazarian, A. 2008, ApJ 677, 1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar