Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:36:37.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effortful control as predictor of adolescents' psychological and physiological responses to a social stress test: The Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2011

Albertine J. Oldehinkel ,
Catharina A. Hartman ,
Esther Nederhof ,
Harriëtte Riese  and
Johan Ormel
Albertine J. Oldehinkel*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Catharina A. Hartman
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Esther Nederhof
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Harriëtte Riese
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Johan Ormel
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Albertine J. Oldehinkel, Interdisciplinary Center for Psychiatric Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, CC72, P.O. Box 30.001, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; E-mail: a.j.oldehinkel@med.umcg.nl.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effortful control is thought to foster adaptive action in defensive contexts and may thereby protect individuals against anxious inhibition and focus on their own distress. We examined if effortful control predicted adolescents' perceived arousal, unpleasantness, and control as well as autonomic (heart rate [HR]) and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (cortisol) responses during social stress. The data came from a focus sample of the Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey, a prospective population study of Dutch adolescents (N = 715, 50.9% girls; mean age = 16.11, SD = 0.59), who participated in a laboratory session including a social stress task (public speaking and mental arithmetic). Perceived and physiological stress measures were assessed before, during, and after the social stress task. Effortful control was measured using various questionnaires and informants, as well as by means of a reaction time (RT) task assessing response inhibition. Overall, adolescents with high questionnaire-based effortful control tended to feel more relaxed, pleasant, and in control during the laboratory session than adolescents with lower levels of control and had stronger HR responses to the stress test. Adolescent girls with high inhibitory control as measured by the RT task also had strong HR responses, but inhibitory control was associated with high rather than low perceived arousal. Our results suggest that both questionnaire and RT measures of effortful control predict strong HR responses to challenging situations, but associational patterns diverge with regard to perceived stress measures.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , May 2011 , pp. 679 - 688
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernardi, L., Wdowczyk-Szulc, J., Valenti, C., Castoldi, S., Passino, C., Spadacini, G., et al. (2000). Effects of controlled breathing, mental activity and mental stress with or without verbalization on heart rate variability. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 35, 1462–1469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biondi, M., & Picardi, A. (1999). Psychological stress and neuroendocrine function in humans: The last two decades of research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 68, 114–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouma, E. M. C., Riese, H., Ormel, J., Verhulst, F. C., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2009). Adolescents' cortisol responses to awakening and social stress: Effects of gender, menstrual phase and oral contraceptives. The TRAILS Study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 884–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunnekreef, J. A., De Sonneville, L. M. J., Althaus, M., Minderaa, R. B., Oldehinkel, A. J., Verhulst, F.C., et al. (2007). Information processing profiles of internalizing and externalizing behavior problems: Evidence from a population-based sample of preadolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, S. D., & Fox, N. A. (2002). Self-regulatory processes in early personality development: A multilevel approach to the study of childhood social withdrawal and aggression. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, S. D., & Keane, S.P. (2004). Cardiac vagal regulation across the preschool period: Stability, continuity, and implications for childhood adjustment. Developmental Psychobiology, 45, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, H. A., Woltering, S., Lamm, C., & Lewis, M. D. (2010). Hearts and minds: Coordination of neurocognitive and cardiovascular regulation in children and adolescents. Biological Psychology 84, 296–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Progress, problems, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 87–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.Google Scholar
Derryberry, D., Reed, M. A., & Pilkenton-Taylor, C. (2003). Temperament and coping: Advantages from an individual differences perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 1049–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derryberry, D., & Rothbart, M. K. (1997). Reactive and effortful processes in the organization of temperament. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 633–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Sonneville, L. M. J. (1999). Amsterdam Neuropsychological Tasks: A computer-aided assessment program. In Den Brinker, B. P. L. M., Beek, P. J., Brand, A. N., Maarse, F. J., & Mulder, L. J. M. (Eds.), Cognitive ergonomics, clinical assessment, and computer-assisted learning: Computers in psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 187–203). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
De Winter, A. F., Oldehinkel, A. J., Veenstra, R., Brunnekreef, J. A., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2005). Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents. European Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 355–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, A., Riese, H., Sondeijker, F. E. P. L., Greaves-Lord, K., Van Roon, A. M., Ormel, J., et al. (2007). Externalizing and internalizing problems in relation to autonomic function: A population-based study in preadolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 378–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Champion, C., & Ma, Y. (2004). Emotion-related regulation: An emerging construct. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 50, 236–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Spinrad, T. L., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Reiser, M., et al. (2001). The relations of regulation and emotionality to children's externalizing and internalizing problem behavior. Child Development, 72, 1112–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional emotionality and regulation: Their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 136–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Fabes, R. A., Reiser, M., Cumberland, A., Shepard, S. A., et al. (2004). The relations of effortful control and impulsivity to children's resiliency and adjustment. Child Development, 75, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, L. K., Rothbart, M. K., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Individual differences in executive attention predict self-regulation and adolescent psychosocial behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 337–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, D., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Developing a model for adult temperament. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 868–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabes, R. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Regulatory control and adults' stress-related responses to daily life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1107–1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2002). Early intervention and the development of self-regulation. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 22, 307–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankenhauser, M. (1982). Challenge–control interaction as reflected in sympathetic–adrenal activity: Comparison between the sexes. Scandinavian Journal of Physiology, S1, 158–164.Google Scholar
Hartman, C. A. (2000). Nederlandse vertaling van de Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire [Dutch translation of the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire]. Unpublished manuscript, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Hessler, D. M., & Katz, L. (2007). Children's emotion regulation: Self-report and physiological response to peer provocation. Developmental Psychology, 43, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, H. A., De Fruyt, F., & Ormel, J. (2003). NEO-Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten NEO-PI-R en NEO-FFI: Handleiding [NEO Personality Questionnaires NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI: Manual]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. C., Malmstadt, J. R., Larson, C. L., & Davidson, R. J. (2000). Suppression and enhancement of emotional responses to unpleasant pictures. Psychophysiology, 37, 515–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The “Trier Social Stress Test”—A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschbaum, C., Read, G. F., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1992). Assessment of hormones and drugs in saliva in biobehavioral research. Bern: Hogrege & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G., Murray, K., & Harlan, E. T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kudielka, B., Hellhammer, S. H., & Wüst, S. (2009). Why do we respond so differently? Reviewing determinants of human salivary cortisol responses to challenge. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 2–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lengua, L. J., & Long, A. C. (2002). The role of emotionality and self-regulation in the appraisal-coping process: Tests of direct and moderating effects. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabian, A., & Russel, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 242–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldehinkel, A. J., Hartman, C. A., De Winter, A. F., Veenstra, R., & Ormel, J. (2004). Temperament profiles associated with internalizing and externalizing problems in preadolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 421–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldehinkel, A. J., Hartman, C. A., Ferdinand, R. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). Effortful control as modifier of the association between negative emotionality and adolescents' mental health problems. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 523–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldehinkel, A. J., Ormel, J., Bosch, N. M., Bouma, E. M. C., Van Roon, A., Rosmalen, J. G. M., et al. (2011). Stressed out? Associations between perceived and physiological stress responses in adolescents. The TRAILS study. Psychophysiology, 48, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, S. L., Schilling, E. M., & Bates, J. E. (1999). Measurement of impulsivity: Construct coherence, longitudinal stability, and relationship with externalizing problems in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (1996). Inhibition in ADHD, aggressive, and anxious children: A biologically based model of child psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ormel, J., Oldehinkel, A. J., Ferdinand, R. F., Hartman, C. A., De Winter, A. F., Veenstra, R., et al. (2005). Internalising and externalising problems in adolescence: General and dimension-specific effects of familial loadings and preadolescent temperament traits. Psychological Medicine, 35, 1825–1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, M. L., Godaert, G. L. R., Ballieux, R. E., Van Vliet, M., Willemsen, J. J., Sweep, F. C. G. J., et al. (1998). Cardiovascular and endocrine responses to experimental stress: effort of mental effort and controllability. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porges, S. W. (1995). Orienting in a defensive world: Mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A polyvagal theory. Psychophysiology, 32, 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (1998). Attention, self-regulatin, and consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 353B, 1915–1927.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., Sheese, B. E., & Tang, Y. (2007). The anterior cingulated gyrus and the mechanism of self-regulation. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 391–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Temperament, development, and personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 122–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., Rueda, M. R., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Developing mechanisms of temperamental effortful control. Journal of Personality, 71, 1113–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K., & Rueda, M. R. (2005). The development of effortful control. In Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Keele, S. (Eds.), Developing individuality in the human brain: A tribute to Michael I. Posner (pp. 167–188). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Royston, P. (2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Updata of ICE. Stata Journal, 5, 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). The development of executive attention: Contributions to the emergence of self-regulation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, M. R., & Rothbart, M. K. (2009). The influence of temperament on the development of coping: The role of maturation and experience. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 124, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children (3rd ed., rev.). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2007). The development of coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, R. P., Korten, J. B., & Myers, M. M. (1991). Components of heart rate reactivity during mental arithmetic with and without speaking. Physiology & Behavior, 50, 1039–1045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
StataCorp. (2007). Stata Statistical software: Release 10 [Computer Software]. College Station, TX: Author.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stice, E., & Gonzales, N. (1998). Adolescent temperament moderates the relation of parenting to antisocial behavior and substance use. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valiente, C., Eisenberg, N., Smith, C. L., Reiser, M., Fabes, R. A., Losoya, S., et al. (2003). The relations of effortful control and reactive control to children's externalizing problems: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Personality, 71, 1171–1196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Haassen, P. P., De Bruyn, E. E. J., Pijl, Y. L., Poortinga, Y. H., Lutje Spelberg, H. C., VanderSteene, G., et al. (1986). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised (Dutch ed.). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Vasey, M. W., El-Hag, N., & Daleiden, E. L. (1996). Anxiety and the processing of emotionally threatening stimuli: distinctive patterns of selective attention among high- and low-test-anxious children. Child Development, 67, 1173–1185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A. F. & Ormel, J. (2006). Temperament, environment, and antisocial behavior in a population sample of preadolescent boys and girls. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 422–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M., Jaeger, A., & Shinar, O. (2001). Family risk factors and adolescent substance use: Moderation effects for temperamental dimensions. Developmental Psychology, 37, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar