Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:10:12.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the microhydrodynamics of superspreading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

C. MALDARELLI*
Affiliation:
Levich Institute, Department of Chemical Engineering, City College of City University of New York, New York, NY 10031, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Droplets of an aqueous phase placed on a very hydrophobic, waxy surface bead-up rather than spread, forming a sessile drop with a relatively large contact angle at the edge of the drop. Surfactant molecules, when dissolved in the aqueous phase, can facilitate the wetting of an aqueous drop on a hydrophobic surface. One class of surfactants, superwetters, can cause aqueous droplets to move very rapidly over a hydrophobic surface, thereby completely wetting the surface (superspreading). A recent numerical study of the hydrodynamics of superspreading by Karapetsas, Craster & Matar (J. Fluid Mech., this issue, vol. 670, 2011, pp. 5–37) provides a clear explanation of how these surfactants cause such a dramatic change in wetting behaviour. The study shows that large spreading rates occur when the surfactant can transfer directly from the air/aqueous to the aqueous/hydrophobic solid interface at the contact line. This transfer reduces the concentration of surfactant on the fluid interface, which would otherwise be elevated due to the advection accompanying the drop spreading. The reduced concentration creates a Marangoni force along the fluid surface in the direction of spreading, and a concave rim in the vicinity of the contact line with a large dynamic contact angle. Both of these effects act to increase the spreading rate. The molecular structure of the superwetters allows them to assemble on a hydrophobic surface, enabling the direct transfer from the fluid to the solid surface at the contact line.

Type
Focus on Fluids
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

References

He, M., Hill, R. M., Lin, Z., Scriven, L. & Davis, H. 1993 Phase behavior and microstructure of polyoxyethylene trisiloxane surfactants in aqueous solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 88208834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. M. 1998 Superspreading. Curr. Opin. Colliod Interface Sci. 3, 247254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. M., He, M., Davis, T. & Scriven, L. 1994 Comparison of the liquid crystal phase behavior of four trisiloxane superwetter surfactants. Langmuir 10, 17241734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karapetsas, G., Craster, R. V. & Matar, O. K. 2011 On surfactant enhanced spreading and superspreading of liquid drops on solid surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 670, 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruckenstein, E. 1996 Effect of short range interactions on spreading. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179, 136142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoebe, T., Hill, R. M., Ward, M. D. & Davis, H. T. 1997 Enhanced spreading of aqueous films containing ionic surfactants on solid substrates. Langmuir 13, 72767281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoebe, T., Lin, Z., Hill, R. M., Ward, M. D. & Davis, H. T. 1996 Surfactant enhanced spreading. Langmuir 12, 337–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar