Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T01:27:36.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Striking the Right Balance: Of High Walls and Divisions of Labor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2010

Ronald R. Krebs
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota. E-mail: rkrebs@umn.edu

Extract

The academy and the military would seem to be radically different institutions. Militaries are fundamentally hierarchical: at the end of the day, orders must be obeyed. At least in principle—and the emphasis here is on principle, since anyone who has lived within the academy knows how far reality departs from this purported ideal—academic disciplines prize the questioning of presuppositions and foster an antiauthoritarian culture. In military units, individuals must sublimate themselves to the group. Scholarship, at least in the humanities and social sciences, is often a lonely enterprise, whose costs are borne by and whose rewards accrue to individuals. The contemporary US officer corps disproportionately identifies with the Republican Party, while academics tend to identify with Democrats, and sometimes farther to the left. Samuel Huntington (in)famously saw as inherent and necessary the cultural divergences between military and civilian life. This would all the more powerfully seem to apply to the armed forces and the academy, to uniform and gown.

Type
Reflections Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

George, Alexander L. 1972. The Case for Multiple Advocacy in Making Foreign Policy. American Political Science Review 66(3): 751–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. 1980. Presidential Decisionmaking in Foreign Policy: The Effective Use of Information and Advice. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mosser, Michael W. 2010. “Puzzles versus Problems: The Alleged Disconnect between Academics and Military Practitioners.” Perspectives 8(4): 10771086.Google Scholar