Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T21:08:26.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards the design of an optimal mixer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2010

OLEG GUBANOV
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada
LUCA CORTELEZZI*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada
*
Email address for correspondence: crtlz@cim.mcgill.ca

Abstract

We define as an optimal mixer a mixing device able to deliver a uniformly optimal mixing performance over a wide range of operating and initial conditions. We consider the conceptual problem of designing an optimal mixer starting from a well-known reference mixer, the sine flow. We characterize the mixing performance of the reference mixer, and show that it performs poorly and erratically over a wide range of operating conditions and is quite sensitive to the geometry of the initial concentration field. We define as a target performance the best mixing performance the reference mixer is able to achieve. In steps we modify the design of the reference mixer. First, we optimize the time sequence of the switching protocols and show that the mixing performance of the time-optimized mixer, although substantially improved with respect to the reference mixer, is still far from achieving the target performance and being insensitive to the geometry of the initial concentration field. The analysis of the performance of the time-optimized mixer brings to light the deficiency of the actuating system used, which delivers always the same amount of shear at the same locations. We modify the actuating system by allowing the stirring velocity fields to shift along their coordinate axes. A new mixer, the space-optimized mixer, is created by equipping the reference mixer with the new actuating system and optimizing the shift of the stirring velocity field at each iteration. The space-optimized mixer is able to deliver the target performance over the upper two-thirds of the operating range. In the lower one-third, the performance of the space-optimized mixer deteriorates because of the use of a periodic protocol. A optimal mixer is finally obtained using the actuating system of the space-optimized mixer and coupling the time and shift optimizations. The resulting optimal mixer is able to deliver a uniform target performance, insensitive to the geometry of the initial conditions, over the entire operating range.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adrover, A., Cerbelli, S. & Giona, M. 2002 A spectral approach to reaction/diffusion kinetics in chaotic flows. Comput. Chem. Engng 26, 125139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, M. M., Muzzio, F. J., Cerbelli, S., Adrover, A. & Giona, M. 1998 Self-similar spatiotemporal structure of intermaterial boundaries in chaotic flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 33953398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonsen, T. M. Jr., Fan, Z., Ott, E. & Garcia-Lopez, E. 1996 The role of chaotic orbits in the determination of power spectra of passive scalars. Phys. Fluids 8, 30943104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aref, H. 1984 Stirring by chaotic advection. J. Fluid Mech. 143, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aref, H. 2002 The development of chaotic advection. Phys. Fluids 14, 13151325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aref, H. & El Naschie, M. S. (Eds.) 1995 Chaos Applied to Fluid Mixing. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Cerbelli, S., Alvarez, M. M. & Muzzio, F. J. 2002 Prediction and quantification of micromixing intensities in laminar flows. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 48, 686700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortelezzi, L., Adrover, A. & Giona, M. 2008 Feasibility, efficiency and transportability of short horizon optimal mixing protocols. J. Fluid Mech. 597, 199231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunha, A. G., Covas, J. A. & Oliveira, P. 1998 Optimization of polymer extrusion with genetic algorithms. IMA J. Math. Appl. Bus. Indus. 9, 267277.Google Scholar
D'Alessandro, D., Dahleh, M. & Mezić, I. 1999 Control of mixing in fluid flow: a maximum entropy approach. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 44, 18521863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, M. D., Cox, S. M. & Byrne, H. M. 2004 Mixing measures for a two-dimensional chaotic stokes flow. J. Engng Math. 48, 129155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, M. D., Thiffeault, J.-L. & Gouillart, E. 2006 Topological chaos in spatially periodic mixers. Physica D 221, 92100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florek, C. A. & Tucker, C. L. 2005 Stretching distributions in chaotic mixing of droplet dispersions with unequal viscosities. Phys. Fluids 17, 053101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franjione, J. G. & Ottino, J. M. 1992 Symmetry concepts for the geometric analysis of mixing flows. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 338, 301323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froyland, G. & Padberg, K. 2009 Almost-invariant sets and invariant manifolds: connecting probabilistic and geometric descriptions of coherent structures in flows. Physica D 238, 15071523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibout, S., Guer, Y. L. & Schall, E. 2006 Coupling of a mapping method and a genetic algorithm to optimize mixing efficiency in periodic chaotic flows. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 11, 413423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giona, M., Adrover, A., Cerbelli, S. & Vitacolonna, V. 2004 Spectral properties and transport mechanisms of partially chaotic bounded flows in the presence of diffusion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 114101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giona, M., Cerbelli, S. & Adrover, A. 2002 Geometry of reaction interfaces in chaotic flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 024501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleeson, J. P. 2005 Transient micromixing: examples of laminar and chaotic stirring. Phys. Fluids 17, 100614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouillart, E., Thiffeault, J.-L. & Finn, M. D. 2006 Topological mixing with ghost rods. Phys. Rev. E 73, 036311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gubanov, O. & Cortelezzi, L. 2009 Sensitivity of mixing optimization to the geometry of the initial scalar field. In Analysis and Control of Mixing with an Application to Micro and Macro Flow Processes (ed. Cortelezzi, L. & Mezić, I.), CISM Courses and Lectures 510, pp. 369405. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, D. M., Alvarez, M. M. & Muzzio, F. J. 1997 Mixing in globally chaotic flows: a self-similar process. Fractals 5, 395425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, D. M. & Muzzio, F. J. 1997 Effects of injection location, flow ratio and geometry on kenics mixer performance. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 43, 31213132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolda, T. G. 2005 Revisiting asynchronous parallel pattern search for nonlinear optimization. SIAM J. Optimization 16 (2), 563586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. L. & Wood, D. E. 1966 Branch-and-bound methods: a survey. Operations Res. 14, 699719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. M. & Torczon, V. 2000 Pattern search methods for linearly constrained minimization. SIAM J. Optimization 10, 917941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, M., Muzzio, F. J. & Peskin, R. L. 1994 Quantification of mixing in aperiodic chaotic flows. Chaos Solitons Fractals 4, 869893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malvern, L. E. 1969 Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Mathew, G., Mezić, I., Grivopoulos, S., Vaidya, U. & Petzold, L. 2007 Optimal control of mixing in stokes fluid flows. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 261281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathew, G., Mezić, I. & Petzold, L. 2005 A multiscale measure for mixing and its applications. Physica D 211, 2346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muzzio, F. J., Alvarez, M. M., Cerbelli, S., Giona, M. & Adrover, A. 2000 The intermaterial area density generated by time- and spatially periodic 2d chaotic flows. Chem. Engng Sci. 55, 14971508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Naraigh, L. & Thiffeault, J.-L. 2008 Bounds on the mixing enhancement for a stirred binary fluid. Physica D 237, 26732684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottino, J. M. 1989 The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos, and Transport. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, E. L., Atiemo-Obeng, V. A. & Kresta, S. M. (Ed.) 2004 Handbook of Industrial Mixing: Science and Practice. Wiley.Google Scholar
Phelps, J. H. & Tucker, C. L. 2006 Lagrangian particle calculations of distributive mixing: limitations and applications. Chem. Engng Sci. 61, 68266836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, R. T. 1994 Tracer microstructure in the large-eddy dominated regime. Chaos Solitons Fractals 4, 10911110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, R. T. 2000 Lattice models of advection-diffusion. Chaos Solitons Fractals 10, 6174.Google ScholarPubMed
Rodrigo, A. J. S., Mota, J. P. B., Lefevre, A. & Saatdjian, E. 2003 On the optimization of mixing protocol in a certain class of three-dimensional stokes flows. Phys. Fluids 15, 15051516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, T. A., Thiffeault, J.-L. & Doering, C. R. 2007 Stirring up trouble: multi-scale mixing measures for steady scalar sources. Physica D 231, 143164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M. K., Anderson, P. D., Speetjens, M. F. M. & Meijer, H. E. H. 2008 a Optimizing the rotated arc mixer. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 54, 28092822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M. K., Kang, T. G., Meijer, H. E. H. & Anderson, P. D. 2008 b The mapping method as a toolbox to analyse, design, and optimize micromixers. Microfluid Nanofluid 5, 313325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stremler, M. A. 2009 Fluid mixing, chaotic advection, and microarray analysis. In Analysis and Control of Mixing with an Application to Micro and Macro Flow Processes (ed. Cortelezzi, L. & Mezić, I.), CISM Courses and Lectures 510, pp. 323337. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stremler, M. A. & Cola, B. A. 2006 A maximum entropy approach to optimal mixing in a pulsed source-sink flow. Phys. Fluids 18, 011701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturman, R., Ottino, J. M. & Wiggins, S. 2006 The Mathematical Foundations of Mixing: The Linked Twist Map as a Paradigm in Applications: Micro to Macro, Fluids to Solids. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalai, E. S., Kukura, J., Arratia, P. E. & Muzzio, F. J. 2003 Effect of hydrodynamics on reactive mixing in laminar flows. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 49, 168179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalai, E. S. & Muzzio, F. J. 2003 Fundamental approach to the design and optimization of static mixers. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 49, 26872699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiffeault, J.-L., Doering, C. R. & Gibbon, J. D. 2004 A bound on mixing efficiency for the advection-diffusion equation. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 105114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiffeault, J.-L. & Pavliotis, G. A. 2008 Optimizing the source distribution in fluid mixing. Physica D 237, 918929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikhansky, A. & Cox, S. M. 2007 Conditional moment closure for chemical reactions in laminar chaotic flows. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 53, 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalc, J. M. & Muzzio, F. J. 1999 Parallel–competitive reactions in a two-dimensional chaotic flow. Chem. Engng Sci. 54, 10531069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalc, J. M., Szalai, E. S. & Muzzio, F. J. 2003 Mixing dynamics in the SMX static mixer as a function of injection location and flow ratio. Polym. Engng Sci. 43, 875890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar