Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:58:36.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Blackberries, Tweets, and YouTube: Technology and the Future of Communicating with Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

Colleen J. Shogan
Affiliation:
Congressional Research Service

Extract

From the establishment of the United States Postal Service and the invention of the telegram, to the introduction of C-SPAN and the explosion of the Internet, the development of new communication technologies has always affected the functioning of Congress. Not surprisingly, recent innovations such as e-mail and social networking have spurred Congress to alter the way it operates as an institution, and rethink the manner in which it engages the public. In this brief examination, I discuss recent changes in congressional behavior and practices due to technological innovation, specifically the proliferation of social networking Web sites. Then, I cautiously predict future trends in the use of social networking and related technologies as they become more integrated in congressional offices and increase the capacity for more robust internal and constituent communications over time.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

COST. 2009. “Experts Forecast 2030 in the Wake of the Digital Revolution.” European Cooperation in Science and Technology. http://www.cost.esf.org/about_cost/cost_stories/foresight_2030.Google Scholar
Glassman, Matthew Eric, Straus, Jacob R., and Shogan, Colleen J.. 2009. “Social Networking and Constituent Communication: Member Use of Twitter during a Two-Week Period in the 111th Congress.” CRS Report. R40823.Google Scholar
Straus, Jacob. 2010. “Dear Colleague Letters: Current Practices.” CRS Report. RL34636.Google Scholar
Straus, Jacob. 2009. “Dear Colleague Letters in the House of Representatives: The Tracking of Internal House Communications.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 2–5.Google Scholar
Vaida, Bara. 2007. “Blogging On.” National Journal, October 6. http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/nj_20071006_5.php.Google Scholar
Vogel, Ken. 2009. “For GOP, Revenge is Tweet,” Politico.com, September 23. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27464.html.Google Scholar