Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:19:54.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Stellar Populations of M32: Resolving the nearest elliptical with HST ACS/HRC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Antonela Monachesi
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV, Groningen, the Netherlands email: monachesi@astro.rug.nl
S. C. Trager
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV, Groningen, the Netherlands email: monachesi@astro.rug.nl
Tod R. Lauer
Affiliation:
NOAO
Wendy Freedman
Affiliation:
OCIW
Alan Dressler
Affiliation:
OCIW
Carl Grillmair
Affiliation:
Caltech
Kenneth Mighell
Affiliation:
NOAO
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the deepest colour-magnitude diagram (CMD) of M32 to date, obtained from deep (F435W, F555W) photometry of HST ACS/HRC images. Due to the high resolution of our images, the small photometric errors, and the completeness level of our data we obtain the most detailed resolved photometric study of M32 to date. The CMD of M32 displays a wide colour distribution of red giant branch stars, mainly due to a metallicity spread, a strong red clump and bright asymptotic giant branch stars. The detection of a “blue plume” in M32 indicates the presence of a very young stellar population. There is not a noticeable presence of blue horizontal branch stars, suggesting that an old population with [Fe/H] < −1.5 does not significantly contribute to the light or mass of M32 in our observed fields.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Alves, D. R. & Sarajedini, A. 1999, ApJ, 511, 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, D. & Heiles, C. 1982, AJ, 87, 1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., & Fernandes, R. C. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidge, T. J. & Jensen, J. B. 2007, AJ, 133, 576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentino, G., Monachesi, A., Trager, S. C., Lauer, T. R., Saha, A., Mighell, K., Freedman, W. L., Dressler, A., Grillmair, C. J., & Tolstoy, E. 2009, ApJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
Girardi, L., Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Marigo, P., Salasnich, B., & Weiss, A. 2002, A&A, 391, 195Google Scholar
Grillmair, C. J. et al. 1996, AJ, 112, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauer, T. R. 1999, PASP, 111, 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marigo, P., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Silva, L., & Granato, G. L. 2008, A&A, 482, 883Google Scholar
Monachesi, A., Trager, S. C., Lauer, T. R., Freedman, W. L., Dressler, A., Grillmair, C. J., & Mighell, K. 2009, ApJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, R. W. 1980, ApJ, 236, 430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J. A. 1985, AJ, 90, 1927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetson, P. B. 1987, PASP, 99, 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, S. C., Faber, S. M., Worthey, G., & González, J. J. 2000, AJ, 120, 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar