Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T22:16:19.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On global stability of thin ionized disks immersed in an external magnetic field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

Edward Liverts
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel email: eliverts@bgu.ac.il, mond@bgu.ac.il
Michael Mond
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel email: eliverts@bgu.ac.il, mond@bgu.ac.il
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The problem of the global stability of rotating magnetized thin disks is considered. The appropriate boundary value problem (BVP) of the linearized MHD equations is solved by employing the WKB approximation to describe the dynamical development of an initial perturbation. The eigenfrequencies as well as eigenfunctions are explicitly obtained and are verified numerically. The importance of considering the initial value problem (IVP) as well as the question of global stability for finite systems is emphasized and discussed in detail. It is further shown that thin enough disks are stable (global stability) but as their thickness grows increasing number of unstable modes participate in the solution of the IVP. However it is demonstrated that due to the localization of the initial perturbation the growth time of the instability may be significantly longer than the calculated inverse growth rate of the individual unstable eigenfunctions.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Balbus, S. A. & Hawley, J. F. 1991, ApJ 376, 214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budker, G. I. 1956, Atomic Energy 1, 673Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1960, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. A46, 223Google Scholar
Coppi, B. & Coppi, P. S. 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 051101Google Scholar
Coppi, B. & Keyes, E. A. 2003, ApJ 595, 1000Google Scholar
Ji, H. T., Burin, M., Schartman, E., & Goodman, J. 2006, Nature 444, 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. D., 1946, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 16, 574 [1946, J. Phys. USSR, 10,25]Google Scholar
Liverts, E. & Mond, M. 2008, MNRAS (in press), astro-ph 0810.1864v1Google Scholar
Noguchi, K., Pariev, V. I., Colgate, S. A., Beckley, H. F., & Nordhaus, J. 2002, ApJ 575, 1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüdiger, G., Hollerbach, R., Stefani, F., Gundrum, T., Gerbeth, G., & Rosner, R. 2006, ApJ 649, L145Google Scholar
Sano, T. & Miyama, S. M. 1999, ApJ 515, 776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturrock, P. A. 1958, Phys. Rev. A 112, 1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velikhov, E. P. 1959, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 36, 1398 [1959, Sov. Phys. JETP 36, 995].Google Scholar