Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:47:16.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What about phonological facilitation, response-set membership, and phonological coactivation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

Peter A. Starreveld  and
Wido La Heij
Peter A. Starreveld
Affiliation:
Unit of Experimental and Theoretical Psychology, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlandsstarreve@rulfsw.leidenuniv.nllahey@rulfsw.leidenuniv.nl www.fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Wido La Heij
Affiliation:
Unit of Experimental and Theoretical Psychology, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlandsstarreve@rulfsw.leidenuniv.nllahey@rulfsw.leidenuniv.nl www.fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We discuss two inconsistencies between Levelt et al.'s model and existing theory about, and data from, picture-word experiments. These inconsistencies show that the empirical support for weaver++ is much weaker than Levelt et al. suggest. We close with a discussion of the proposed explanation for phonological coactivation of near synonyms of a target word.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 56 - 58
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)