Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:17:27.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Liberal Nation In Spite of Itself

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Michael Kazin
Affiliation:
Georgetown University

Extract

All praise to Jeff Cowie and Nick Salvatore. They've dared to look deep into the pit of progressive hopes in modern US history and have emerged with something important and new to say about that much debated, much lamented subject. And they get certain big things right. The hegemony of individualism, the historic weakness of the labor movement, divisions of race, and the ways in which most white Christians apply their religious faith have all interacted to limit what, in Europe, are called the prospects of social-democracy and, in this country, usually go under the name of modern liberalism. Their concluding suggestion that reformers may find in “the fluid alliances of the Progressive Era” a more helpful analogy than in the class-based coalition led by FDR is a welcome provocation, although they don't choose to elaborate on it.

Type
Scholarly Controversy: Rethinking the Place of the New Deal in American History
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Free, and Cantril, , The Political Beliefs of Americans (New Brunswick, NJ, 1967)Google Scholar.

2. Wolfe, Alan, “Why Conservatives Can't Govern,” Washington Monthly, July/August 2006Google Scholar.

3. Harrison, J.F.C., Quest for the New Moral World: Robert Owen and the Owenites in Britain and America (New York, 1969), 249Google Scholar.

4. Pinckney, Darryl, “Dreams from Obama,” New York Review of Books, March 6, 2008, 41Google Scholar.

5. Karl Marx, “Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right“(1844).