Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T23:10:45.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Governing Moods: Anxiety, Boredom, and the Ontological Overcoming of Politics in Heidegger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2008

Jonathan McKenzie
Jonathan McKenzie*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
*
Jonathan McKenzie, Department of Political Science, Purdue University, 100 N. University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907USA, jemckenz@purdue.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Much recent scholarship explores the consequences of Heidegger's transformation of philosophic thinking for our understanding of political theory at the edge of modernity. In a response to recent readings, this essay argues that the contemporary literature on Heidegger fails to account for two fundamental concerns: the ontic/ontological distinction and the importance of moods, particularly anxiety and boredom. Utilizing these moods, this essay explores the ways in which Heidegger's thought escapes politics through a privileging of the ontological, or object-less, experience, relying on a reclusive reflection as the way to authenticity. Instead of fostering a strong community or strong liberal sense of self, Heidegger leaves us with the nothingness of anxiety and the emptiness of boredom as our alternatives. By transcending the ontic in favor of the ontological, Heidegger divorces himself from politics in the everyday sense and posits an existential response to political theory that is unable to foster authentic collective life.

Résumé. Une part importante de la littérature récente explore les conséquences de la transformation de la pensée philosophique amenée par Heidegger et ses effets sur notre compréhension de la théorie politique à l'aube de l'ère moderne. En réponse à de récentes lectures, cet essai relève deux manquements fondamentaux dans la littérature contemporaine sur Heidegger. Le premier concerne la distinction entre l'ontique et l'ontologique et le deuxième a trait à l'importance des humeurs, plus particulièrement l'anxiété et l'ennui. En explorant ces humeurs, cet essai dévoile les manières dont la pensée de Heidegger échappe à la politique en privilégiant l'expérience ontologique ou immatérielle et en se fondant sur la réflexion recluse, voie qui mène à l'authenticité. Au lieu de favoriser une communauté forte ou un sens profond et libéral de soi, Heidegger nous laisse comme options de rechange le néant de l'anxiété et le vide de l'ennui. En transcendant l'ontique en faveur de l'ontologique, Heidegger se sépare de la politique au sens premier du terme pour donner une réponse existentielle à une théorie politique incapable de forger une vie collective authentique.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 569 - 585
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blattner, William. 2006. Heidegger's Being and Time: A Reader's Guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blitz, Mark. 2000. “Heidegger and the Political.” Political Theory 28(2): 167–96.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. 1984. “Ontology of Freedom: Heidegger and Political Philosophy.” Political Theory 12(2): 204–34.Google Scholar
Dostal, Robert. 1992. “Friendship and Politics: Heidegger's Failing.” Political Theory 20(3): 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1959. Inhibitions, Symptoms, and Anxiety, ed. Strachey, James, trans. Strachey, Alix. New York: Norton Publishers.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time, trans. Edward Robinson, John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, John Macquarrie. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1995. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, trans. Nicholas Walker, William McNeill and Nicholas Walker, William McNeill. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Soren. 1981. The Concept of Anxiety: A Simple Psychologically Orienting Deliberation on the Dogmatic Issue of Hereditary Sin, ed. and trans. Thomte, Reidar. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nishitani, Keiji. 1990. The Self-Overcoming of Nihilism, trans. Graham Parkes and Setsuko Aihara. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Salem-Wiseman, Jonathan. 2003. “Heiegger's Dasein and the Liberal Conception of the Self.” Political Theory 31(4): 533–57.Google Scholar
Sluga, Hans. 1993. Heidegger's Crisis: Philosophy and Politics in Nazi Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Gregory Bruce. 1996. Nietzsche, Heidegger, and the Transition to Postmodernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, George. 1989. Martin Heidegger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. 1995. Timely Meditations: Martin Heidegger and Postmodern Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. 1997. “Postmodernity and the Routinization of Novelty: Heidegger on Boredom and Technology.” Polity 29(4): 489–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, Howard. 1996. The Crowd is Untruth: The Existential Critique of Mass Society in the Thought of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Ortega y Gasset. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Villa, Dana. 1995. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Michael. 1995. Culture/Flesh: Explorations of Post-Civilized Modernity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Young, Julian. 1997. Heidegger, Philosophy, Nazism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael. 1986. Eclipse of Self: The Development of Heidegger's Concept of Authenticity. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar