Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:09:41.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysing Bureau-Shaping Models: Comments on Marsh, Smith and Richards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2004

KEITH DOWDING
Affiliation:
Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Politics, University of Exeter
OLIVER JAMES
Affiliation:
Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Politics, University of Exeter

Abstract

In a recent article in this Journal Marsh, Smith and Richards (MSR) note the massive recent changes in the organization of British government and the attention the bureau-shaping model has received both at a theoretical level and as an explanation of changes. They suggest that the model has breathed new life into debates about the behaviour of officials and is important in the context of the ‘Next Steps’ agency reform. They state two aims of their article: ‘First, it is a critical contribution to the literature on the bureau-shaping model’, and secondly it examines ‘the model's utility as an explanation of the changes that have occurred in British central government in the past decade’. They also use their arguments as part of an assault upon rational choice and empirical political science more generally in favour of interpretative sociology. However, in this Note, we respond to their work on the bureau-shaping model and rational choice.

Type
Notes and Comments
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)