Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:45:40.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution of Progenitor Stars of Type Ibc Supernovae and Long Gamma-Ray Bursts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

Sung-Chul Yoon ,
Norbert Langer ,
Matteo Cantiello ,
Stan E. Woosley  and
Gary A. Glatzmaier
Sung-Chul Yoon
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
Norbert Langer
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Matteo Cantiello
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Stan E. Woosley
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
Gary A. Glatzmaier
Affiliation:
Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss how rotation and binary interactions may be related to the diversity of type Ibc supernovae and long gamma-ray bursts. After presenting recent evolutionary models of massive single and binary stars including rotation, the Tayler-Spruit dynamo and binary interactions, we argue that the nature of SNe Ibc progenitors from binary systems may not significantly differ from that of single star progenitors in terms of rotation, and that most long GRB progenitors may be produced via the quasi-chemically homogeneous evolution at sub-solar metallicity. We also briefly discuss the possible role of magnetic fields generated in the convective core of a massive star for the transport of angular momentum, which is potentially important for future stellar evolution models of supernova and GRB progenitors.

Keywords

stars: evolution – binaries: close – stars: magnetic fields – stars: rotation – supernovae: general
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S250: Massive Stars as Cosmic Engines , December 2007 , pp. 231 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Braun, H. & Langer, N. 1995, A&A, 297, 483Google Scholar
Brown, G. E., Lee, C.-H., Wijers, R. A. M. J., et al. 2000, NewA, 5, 191Google Scholar
Cantiello, M., Yoon, S.-C., Langer, N., & Livio, M. 2007, A&A, 465, L29Google Scholar
Denissenkov, P. A. & Pinsonneault, M. 2007, ApJ, 655, 1157Google Scholar
Dessart, L., Burrows, A., Livne, E., & Ott, C. 2008, ApJL, 673, 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detmers, R., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, Ph., & Izzard, R. G. 2008, A&A, submitted astro-ph/0804.0014Google Scholar
Fryer, C. L. & Heger, A. 2005, ApJ, 623, 302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glatzmaier, G. A. 1984, J. Comp. Phys., 55, 461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, F., Flores, H., Schaerer, D., et al. 2006, A&A, 454, 103Google Scholar
Heger, A., Langer, N., & Woosley, S. E. 2000, ApJ,Google Scholar
Heger, A., Woosley, S. E., & Spruit, H. C. 2005, ApJ, 626, 350Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E. P. J & Yoon, S.-C. 2007, Ap&SS, 311, 177Google Scholar
Hirschi, R., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2005, A&A, 425, 649Google Scholar
Hunter, I, Lennon, D. J., Dufton, P. I., et al. 2008, A&A, 479, 541Google Scholar
Izzard, R. G., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Tout, C. A. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 1215Google Scholar
Kistler, M. D., Yüksel, H., Beacom, J. F., & Stanek, K. Z. 2008, ApJ, 673, L119Google Scholar
MacFadyen, A. I. & Woosley, S. E. 1999, ApJ, 524, 262Google Scholar
Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 143Google Scholar
Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 2005, A&A, 440, 104Google Scholar
Mazzali, P. A., Kawabata, K. S., Maeda, K., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 592Google Scholar
Meynet, G. & Maeder, A. 2007, A&A, 464, L11Google Scholar
van Marle, A. J., Langer, N., Yoon, S.-C., & Garcia-Segura, G. 2008, A&A, 478, 769Google Scholar
Modjaz, M, Kewley, L., Kirshner, R. P., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 1136Google Scholar
Mokiem, M. R., de Koter, A., Evans, C. J., et al. 2006, A&A, 456, 1131Google Scholar
Podsiadlowski, Ph., Joss, P. C., & Hsu, J. J.L. 1992, ApJ, 391, 246Google Scholar
van Putten, M. H. P. M. 2004, ApJL, 611, 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suijs, M., Langer, N., Poelarends, A. J., et al. 2008, A&A, 481, L87Google Scholar
Spruit, H. C. 2002, A&A, 381, 923Google Scholar
Talon, S. 2007, astro-ph/0708.1499Google Scholar
Woosley, S. E. 1993, ApJ, 405, 273Google Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Bloom, J. S. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 507Google Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Heger, A. 2006, ApJ, 637, 914Google Scholar
Yoon, S.-C. & Langer, N. 2005, A&A,Google Scholar
Yoon, S.-C., Langer, N., & Norman, C. 2006, A&A, 460, 199Google Scholar
Zahn, J.-P., Brun, A. S., & Mathis, S. 2007, A&A, 474, 145Google Scholar